worst part in our little bubble region we have so many carriers there.. unless they do something like what we all have suggested the colonia reqion is gonna totally collapse over time now
Patch Notes Fleet Carriers Update - Patch 4 Patch Notes
worst part in our little bubble region we have so many carriers there.. unless they do something like what we all have suggested the colonia reqion is gonna totally collapse over time now
Remind me please,
what is the crew count of USS Nimitz?
Fred Bloggs & Co.
I only know of a few NPCs, rest is only your specilation
Anyway, we are in the loop of
"FC is a ship it should travel / refuel faster"
"No it's functionally a non-flyable space station that has exceptionally frequent (for a station) hyperjump ability added."
AGAIN
every time i see the name Fred Bloggs im reminded of the AMiga PD legend that was Fred Fish
(some folks will get that)
Nobody had "expectations". We had a game that worked in a particular way for several years, and a new commodity that worked in just that way for the month of so of its existence. People assumed that this was the way it was supposed to work, because it turns out it WAS the way it is supposed to work, as confirmed by FDev itself. So people bought a thing under the assurance that things would continue working as intended, and went on journeys under the expectation that this would continue as such.
Then FDev broke the game. They've admitted they broke it. They've admitted they're trying to fix it, even if they're being abysmally slow about it. There is no conceivable vector of information suggesting that this is intended behavior and that we should just adapt to it, because the developers themselves have told us that it's 100% confirmed to be their screwup.
Are you making a deliberate effort to ignore this in an attempt to troll people with your assurances that they should just suck it up, and blaming them for not planning for game conditions that did not exist at the time of people making their plans and, at the risk of repeating myself, have been confirmed as being the result of the developers messing up?
every time i see the name Fred Bloggs im reminded of the AMiga PD legend that was Fred Fish
Still - it's better to be Fred Bloggs,
then John Doe.
I never said it is stationI only know of a few NPCs, rest is only your specilation
Anyway, we are in the loop of
"FC is a ship it should travel / refuel faster"
"No it's functionally a non-flyable space station that has exceptionally frequent (for a station) hyperjump ability added."
AGAIN
I always assumed it is big space flying cargo. This does not mean that I must charge cargo x4 time then actually it can fly using this charge.Also don't forget. It is SPACE. Only initial impulse means. Which is solved by bigger size of engine. So making fly fast small ship and big ship is same task until you don't turn.
Remind me please,
what is the crew count of USS Nimitz?
Please remind me how often the Nimitz needs to be re-fueled...
I keep looking at the patch notes and i cant find anything related to the NPC Crew.
Yet, last night i had a crew that had a nice and proper British accent, pretty much like Zoey from 2 and half men, season 9 (it was a first for me to find the crew with that specific voice type)
Now after the patch she has the run of the mill normal accent that does not impress me at all.
Why oh why?
Do you have any confirmation that Tri supply/mining do NOT work "as intented" atm?
After 4 weeks of testing this seems like a stretched, wishful thinking.
And requires suppressing the fact, that (laser) mining Tri was improved.
AGAIN:
The previous case of wishful thinking was expecting the gameplay to be invariable.
How many times did we have mining/trade/supply revolutions in ED before the last one?
I was thinking in the same way. Either a fuel scope in the same way KGBFOAM fuelling works. Or that we simply just mine water as some form of fuel to the imagined fusion reactor on the FC. Then we possibly could use tritium as some form of jumponium.
per 20.000 ly range?
| Speed: | 30+ knots (56+ km/h; 35+ mph) |
| Range: | Unlimited distance; 20–25 years |
See that magic word "unlimited" ?
It will not happen, this should already be clear.
Unfortunately FD will probably keep in silence about it, because they should have be more communicative in this area a long time ago.
Now it's too late, they can't really do any comment on the subject of Tritium
- if they admit it's as they have planned - even more commanders would feel "betrayed" by keeping it secret when FCs were introduced.
- if they admit that patch failed to achieve planned goals even after 4 weeks of testing - well, we expect SOME level of incompetency, but not to such extreme.
So, we're gonna need much more popcorn.
Soooo, can't help wonder what the delay was for.......
Oh well great anti-advertising for Odyssey I guess. 'Like this catastrophe? All these bugs and more coming 2021(ish)!'
Oh well great anti-advertising for Odyssey I guess. 'Like this catastrophe? All these bugs and more coming 2021(ish)!'
![[PS4] Lorenzo Waringos](https://forums-cdn.zaonce.net/data/avatars/m/234/234580.jpg?1612617334){kind=avatar}
I reckon it’s an office game, they take bets on how long it takes for avatar changes on the forum.
Not sure...but my online went from 15-20 hrs/day to 0-2 now. I read the books. Can't see this so cool but useless toy >:. Trying to convince myself to sell it
I see a logical problem there:
even if reactor works 20-25 years without changing the cores,
to achieve "unlimited" range the average speed would have to be... unlimited too.
If you want to know the REAL possible range,
just multiply maximal sustainable speed and time
time is already there, we only miss speed.
PS: let's skip maintenance breaks to simplify things.
Comparing to carrier - it has maximum speed too. Exactly it is 1500ly/hr.
So same calculations. Still carrier can fly 43 hours then 120 hours recharge. Nimitz can sweem 25 years, then recharge which takes 1-2 years even if to count producing nuclear fuel in that time. Otherwise 1-2months to replace.