Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12

I think TheAgent has previously said that the rumours he gets come from a lot of different people, so there are often contradictions in what he hears. He just posts whatever gets said by multiple sources. Different departments/studios with different visibility i would guess.
I wouldn't be surprised if different departments have no idea what the others do. I can imagine the handwaving is strong in internal meetings too.
 

Viajero

Volunteer Moderator
I think TheAgent has previously said that the rumours he gets come from a lot of different people, so there are often contradictions in what he hears. He just posts whatever gets said by multiple sources. Different departments/studios with different visibility i would guess.
The rumors can also of course be all made up. Either by the Agent himself or the persons sending them.
 
Point 1 means that points 5 and 6 are a lie.
1, 5 and 6, if all assumed to be true for the sake of the exercise, sound as if personnel are being moved from being employed by CIG to being employed by Turbulent to then be contracted to CIG to develop SC under Turbulent Management and direction
 
The rumors can also of course be all made up. Either by the Agent himself or the persons sending them.


Always possible. But the way TheAgent has discussed the process (and the hits he's had) makes his stuff all welcome intrigue to me :)

I mean, I guess you could fire out a ton of fabricated absurdities and somehow hit on outlier stuff like AMD parterning with CIG again. But it's a bit of a long-shot.

Personally I can very much believe that CIG is pretty chaotic internally about its mid-term goals, and that they probably have a fraught time predicting their own behaviour as it is ;). Let alone communicating it to the outside world from silo-ed internal perspectives. (Add in the doubtless trolling that Agent would likely receive along the way, and it doesn't make for cast-iron journalism or anything ;))

Best to take it as a bit of fun, with some possible truths bouncing around inside it. A fireside drink with the Crobear. It doesn't have to always make sense ;)

It's interesting just how consistent the Turbulent stuff has been recently though. And how stuff like Turbulent dialling up gaming recruitment specifically for SC has continued to tally with that :)
 
Always possible. But the way TheAgent has discussed the process (and the hits he's had) makes his stuff all welcome intrigue to me :)

I mean, I guess you could fire out a ton of fabricated absurdities and somehow hit on outlier stuff like AMD parterning with CIG again. But it's a bit of a long-shot.

Personally I can very much believe that CIG is pretty chaotic internally about its mid-term goals, and that they probably have a fraught time predicting their own behaviour as it is ;). Let alone communicating it to the outside world from silo-ed internal perspectives. (Add in the doubtless trolling that Agent would likely receive along the way, and it doesn't make for cast-iron journalism or anything ;))

Best to take it as a bit of fun, with some possible truths bouncing around inside it. A fireside drink with the Crobear. It doesn't have to always make sense ;)

It's interesting just how consistent the Turbulent stuff has been recently though. And how stuff like Turbulent dialling up gaming recruitment specifically for SC has continued to tally with that :)

That is what i think too. Where he talked about new investment money raised my eyebrow. Record funding for CIG this year and they need more money? For what? Even if they need more Money i don’t think the Calders where that naiv and giving them again money without any returnings.
 
Earlier today (Monday), distributions for the Q4 Buy Back Token began and we released the 2021 Buy Back Token schedule.

I almost daren't ask but what is a 'Buy Back Token'?

Guessing by the fact that Q4 BBT was released / available on the first Monday in Q4 that it somehow involves CIG being given cash for something that doesnt yet exist?


I been watching these but realise Im actually helping the viewer count:(

Then again if he gets 2x as many views for looking at it just a tiny bit more honestly.....
 
as more and more new hires are brought in to replace devs, the code base gets more and more unstable.

Ignoring everything else. Isnt this basically true? Ive heard this many times from many places, working on someone elses code is a nightmare, working on someone esles code from 5 years ago...may as well rewrite and start again. The more hands involved the more complicated it gets, one change here stops 100,000 lines of code working elsewhere for some reason.
 

Deleted member 257907

D
Ignoring everything else. Isnt this basically true? Ive heard this many times from many places, working on someone elses code is a nightmare, working on someone esles code from 5 years ago...may as well rewrite and start again. The more hands involved the more complicated it gets, one change here stops 100,000 lines of code working elsewhere for some reason.
From my limited experience yes it is a nightmare work on someone else's code unless that other person maybe has ocd and is very neat.
I left behind a huge mess too but hey management wanted me to work faster and outsource parts to india XD
 
Back
Top Bottom