Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
Some big brains on SA apparently
Source: https://twitter.com/RobertsSpaceInd/status/1329632240041664512
Some big brains on SA apparently
Source: https://twitter.com/RobertsSpaceInd/status/1329632240041664512
Oh Christ, that makes it even worse :/
Can't wait to test the armour glass...
Last edited:
The last event, some backers had created bots to spam the pledge store to be sure to get a hand on the limited ships they want. It seems these bots have multiplied.
The backers must be splurging!
Arrr! Thar they blows!
imagine if they could fly and you will understand how stupid it is.As stupid as those ?
All starter ships in SC are made to be replaced by better ones as soon as possible. It's like the Radiant Pillar in NMS.
star citizen backers latching on to another dumb hype man
what a coincidence
what a coincidence
lol, that's a good oneThe SA guys figured out what the Nomad is:
Oh Christ, marketing have spotted the crossover between SC fans and Tesla fans.
It's weird seeing cargo-culting done wrong. And working. Jesus.
tbf turn the truck upside down and you have a basic Anaconda
Something tells me you both prefer them for different reasonsThats the joy of a well balanced game though, theres room for both to enjoy it....
For me it is more of an immersion thing. And I'm not huge on immersion.
But setting up and F35 for cargo runs or a 747 for air superiority combat is a bit out of my "ok" level of suspension of disbelief.
I do like how it ends up working in Elite with trade offs/choices.
You can build a paper cargo ship that might blow up in a strong wind with no shields/armor etc, but has a ton of cargo. Or you can sacrifice quite a bit of cargo, but build a very strong cargo ship with strong shields/armor. I dont see those type of choices (at least to the level of give/take) ever being a thing in SC.
Amazing.... its almost like someone uses limited stock to drive up demand of a virtual product. That would be rather unethical though.
And... they're off!
Pledge harder backers! Harder!
It doesn't matter though, CIG could have all the money in the world, they aren't capable of making the game they sold you.
Amazing.... its almost like someone uses limited stock to drive up demand of a virtual product. That would be rather unethical though.
And... they're off!
Pledge harder backers! Harder!
It doesn't matter though, CIG could have all the money in the world, they aren't capable of making the game they sold you.
Credit where credit is due .... CRoberts knows how to milk them!
To be fair, if SC leaned hard into the absurdist, nonsensical, unrealistic, and cartoony appearance it has grown into, it would actually stand a chance of having a good visual style and an art direction worth anything. They're already too far behind everyone who's doing that to be part of the “good graphics” team — might as well go full Tex Avery and make the animations and physics fully intentional. Slap a cell-shader post-processor on top of the rendering pipeline and not only would they be a lot faster in delivering assets, but they would also look infinitely more interesting than the regulation-space-gray morass of uninspired sameness we've seen for the last decade.
Hey, new ship in the show! Totally NOT Anaconda:
Earlier on in the day I described that as an Anaconda wearing Space Battleship Yamato cosplay. Conceptually its a dogs dinner and I strongly dislike it.
I wonder how the interiors match upHey, new ship in the show! Totally NOT Anaconda:
The Anaconda's makes more sense.
Last edited: