CIG’s telemetry page would have you averaging a bit less than that:
The average is probably brought down by any time spent in the bigger cities. If you're avoiding those, fair play to you
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
CIG’s telemetry page would have you averaging a bit less than that:
The average is probably brought down by any time spent in the bigger cities. If you're avoiding those, fair play to you
It was a relatively big and successful event in Star Citizen, compared to other events in Star Citizen.
Nicely put.
Meanwhile in the actual non-dreams SC ( twitch clip )
It seems SaltE longs for release :/
Think plenty of guys enjoyed it. Fighting the Idris, co-op ferrying of boxes, a general reason to cluster in one place.
It wasn’t exactly a promising test though for future variants though. No 'dynamic event' elements, the turrets on an Idris shell alone bringing many 2080s down to sub-15fps (while capped at 40 players as you say).
The infrastructure pretty much buckled. And it’s supposed to lift a lot more than that...
30 fps is not bad if it is consistent. In fact my rig, current version of win 10, and old GTA5 do not like each other. Nominally fps is good. Actually game stutters enough to make it about unplayable.
Its wierd, because in SC its not consistent. There are massive lag spikes as well which makes it feel even worse than the FPS suggests.
Meanwhile, playing Odyssey with like 15-30 FPS and i feels a whole lot smoother and a lot better than the FPS suggests.
Its really strange.
Regardless, both SC and Odyssey need a lot of optimization work.
Star Citizen always looks worse than the given FPS readings due to netcode. The servers are struggling to reach single digit frame rates when all the clients are running at 30+ FPS...so you get exactly what SaltEMike was experiencing in the Twitch clips...the game physics start to break...then you get a snap as the servers and client are momentarily in sync then back to chugging along with nothing working until the client crashes or the server throws out a 30K. 95% of all errors and bugs in SC are directly linked to the server performance.
Every action you take in SC is tied to that server performance from opening a door to calling a ship to walking on solid ground, if the game client is running that at 3 times the speed the servers are chucking out...you can see the issue.
Every action you take in SC is tied to that server performance from opening a door to calling a ship to walking on solid ground, if the game client is running that at 3 times the speed the servers are chucking out...you can see the issue.
Last edited:
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
I dont know man
I would like to see what their servers HTOP shows (assuming that server side is ran on Linux....) Probably all indicators are red
Probably all indicators are red 
Just like you have pro-SC cultists you have anti-SC cultists. The whole "there is no game!" and "CI-No G" sloganeering is just a helpful thing to easily spot the latter.
Its early days of thread development though
Intrepid has made some fair points, but he's also been off on some points as well and offered up some comments direct from the book of the faithful.
We've seen this before, someone comes in trying to appear impartial and wanting to hear alternate views, but within a few pages the tone changes and more and more the excuses come out for CIG until they are revealed as a true believer.
I'm not saying it will happen with Intrepid, but we've seen the pattern on several occasions.
So, i'll see how these alpha posts develop and what the release version of Intrepid looks like
Maybe he will remain a thread regular, chewing the fat over SC's development, talking about his experiences, being critical as appropriate while also talking about what he likes as well. Like a certain Mole or a few others here.
Or maybe he will go full Novak.
What are your rules for someone being an acceptable contributor to this thread then?
For me very simple ones, don't get banned by forum adminstration
Like for every other thread. Though SC whiteknights are going to get quite rough treatment here by partakers Sovapid, and Mole HD are tolerated and even liked because after all they are pretty honest, and offer quite balanced viewpoints.
Last edited:
CIG’s telemetry page would have you averaging a bit less than that:
The average is probably brought down by any time spent in the bigger cities. If you're avoiding those, fair play to you
Yeah, about 50 FPS, i'm limited by the GPU which is loaded at 98%.
What are the rules for not being a "whitenight" ?For me very simple ones, don't get banned by forum adminstration
That propably depends on readers of your posts. There are no hard rules, but typically people form their opinion about you, based on your posts.
I never had any problems with Odyssey, NEVER. Always rock solid 877 frames per second, buttery smooth and so beautiful its hurts.
...must be you
Last edited: