LOL on people that have that opinion I think is both wrong and also very disrespectful.
Even more, that kind of mistaken understanding of market laws, is one of the reasons that undermine gamers position. If we gamers were more demanding about quality, and were more coherent about, not purchasing, the key point, because we "vote" with our money, we will not be in this situation so frequently. They (councils of shareholders of companies) know that there are enough so comprensive, empathic, and specially, so emotional kind of buyers, even personally attached to a game, that they can prioritize easily launch a game unfinished and almost broken (fiscal year, for example), with more benefits than drawbacks in long term doing so. Becase enouh of the old people are going to accept the new game, and they (CEO and shareholders) hope that they are going to bring new people and money later (in this case, fps people).
We buyers as a whole we have what we deserve, but I don't deserve more damage control from other gamers.
I am waiting to console release with both hope and fear (probably more fear than hope) but, I don't LOL on people that are more or less demanding than me, thanks.
How is that voting with your money working out for you?