State of the Game
- Thread starter Fuglydog53
- Start date
Of course not.... Why, that would be unthinkable
As many of the self-professed 'explorers' I read posting on the forum have about as much imagination as the average rock...
as unimaginative as they may be, players flock to the purposely named systems and planets to see if they're named for a reason... So they're mostly all checked out...and the people who do that are generally the kind of people who run those third party database loggers ... so the eddb type systems may be very incomplete in total, they are fairly exhaustive for the systems that stand out from cursory searches like via name.
and? how does that explain the idea that eddb would contain most of 'give me' systems/planets obviously named and leading to the logic that raxxla is also findable that way? there's no connection there. it's not funny / humorous as much as it is just wrong.
Certainly he is some kind of bandit. I suspect a back door variety.
Nope. We have cocaine.
I've never claimed that my argument was rational...
only at fun events (some even include the traditional headwear from the era of adam west)
probably healthier.
you claimed it was logical.
By "fun events" do you mean fishbowls full of keys?
oddly, out of all the events we've been to...none have involved bowls of keys.
I get the feeling that practice is either extinct or entirely misrepresented. It doesn't happen in real events (the whole leaving alone with a partner).
Oh, you meant the Raxxla bit. Yes, that was me being logical, based on your statement to which I was replying.
The "Maury" bit was just irrational, lack of effort rudeness on my part. Please excuse me...
Last edited:
Urban legend realm then?
No, he didn't... read what he wrote again... the logic stool has been yours all along...
Logic is the explorer's imagination, isn't it?
yea... that would just be not only dangerous (in a large enough party where you'd think that would happen) ...but the logistics of everyone getting to their proper home later would be annoying... plus it's just kinda not the point when you goto a party like that. you go to watch. the whole key thing defeats the purpose. it just doesn't make sense. I think it might have happened here and there but it's mostly a hollywood type fabrication.
Hollywood would NEVER lie like that. It would be shameful.
when you use "by that logic" you're making a logical statement you believe is based on the logic of another statement. It's that interpretation that was what was being responded to and refuted by me as not making any sense. Because the idea that eddb catalogs named systems at a higher total % than all systems in general and being usable as a resource for them ...has absolutely nothing to do with then finding raxxla in there.
Yes it does.
except raxxla as a named system or planet doesn't exist at all... so what would make raxxla be within eddb if eddb is more complete on named systems? which has already been established, raxxla is not.