The "How can we encourage players to do pvp" thread is to pvp players as the "search for raxxla" thread is to explorer players.
Well, that is no surprise now, is it?... not by actually launching the game ...
Yeah, I let that one go and probably shouldn't have. -5 points for me...Well, that is no surprise now, is it?
why would it be, it takes many times the time to launch the game and get to where you can search for a stellar object vs just searching eddb which would generally have basically any named system (and associated planets) in it by now.Well, that is no surprise now, is it?
Sadly not although I did have some when in the US a few years ago.are cinnabuns a thing over there in uk land? is it talked about like some shameful drug you only admit to partaking in if other people have admitted as well - like it is over here?
Oh yeah... It's got a few million discovered systems from 400 billion, I forgotwhy would it be, it takes many times the time to launch the game and get to where you can search for a stellar object vs just searching eddb which would generally have basically any named system (and associated planets) in it by now.
Oh yeah... It's got a few million discovered systems from 400 billion, I forgot![]()
By that logic, Raxxla should be in there too. Did you search for that?why would it be, it takes many times the time to launch the game and get to where you can search for a stellar object vs just searching eddb which would generally have basically any named system (and associated planets) in it by now.
Of course not.... Why, that would be unthinkablenearly all of them are not named. people generally goto the named ones, and they get cataloged. Something like Zoo is not going to go un-checked by someone running eddb for 6 years.
by what logic do you think raxxla is named raxxla and yet still not found?By that logic, Raxxla should be in there too. Did you search for that?
French biscuit...like this?Also French biscuits sounds a bit too rude to search on google.
As many of the self-professed 'explorers' I read posting on the forum have about as much imagination as the average rock...
Q.E.D.by what logic do you think raxxla is named raxxla and yet still not found?
Of course not.... Why, that would be unthinkable
As many of the self-professed 'explorers' I read posting on the forum have about as much imagination as the average rock...
by what logic do you think raxxla is named raxxla and yet still not found?
and? how does that explain the idea that eddb would contain most of 'give me' systems/planets obviously named and leading to the logic that raxxla is also findable that way? there's no connection there. it's not funny / humorous as much as it is just wrong.
I did think there was something of the wet bandit about B Ender.
are cinnabuns a thing over there in uk land? is it talked about like some shameful drug you only admit to partaking in if other people have admitted as well - like it is over here?
I've never claimed that my argument was rational...and? how does that explain the idea that eddb would contain most of 'give me' systems/planets obviously named and leading to the logic that raxxla is also findable that way? there's no connection there. it's not funny / humorous as much as it is just wrong.
you claimed it was logical.I've never claimed that my argument was rational...
By "fun events" do you mean fishbowls full of keys?only at fun events (some even include the traditional headwear from the era of adam west)
View attachment 267535