That's because you buy a fully functional car that you can use to go places with. In SC case, people "invest" in promises made by CiG, and their money is then being used to whatever fancy of the day passes through CRoberts mind, instead of delivering the promised product.I don't understand this argument. I guess it makes sense if you're buying stock rather than a product, but when I buy a car for example, I don't concern myself with how the factory divided my payment among its employees.
Now imagine you buy a car, but instead they give you a jpeg of said car, and then spend your money on revamping the marketing office wallpaper. And then, still no car (but the jpeg looks good !). Would you be pleased ?
I'm one of the early backers.Disclaimer - I am not nor ever have been a Kickstarter backer, so maybe that's why I'm left confused by your statement..