yeah we lucky we even have access to half the stuff we do , being able to adjust lods and mipmaps is great , but most of their terrain settings are black boxed , if only 3dmigoto had access to shader variables then we could really go wild.
I found the spot. Parked the Scarab there, because the Cutter would cover too much terrain.
Great game back in the day. Though I didn't play kingdoms.
50 FPS different between your first screenshot and last. But the view distance is great.Out of curiosity, Achenar 1 on my system:
You can use both, just not without manually editing the game options or applying SS via some other method (DSR/VSR, for example).
If you want the game to never throw out LODs at maximum settings, you want 10GiB+ of VRAM.
Not under the default settings as far as I could see, but I'll have a look next time they replace the smoke shader(s) again.
This has bothered me from the very beginning of Odyssey. It seems that in Horizons they created almost the entire terrain with procedural noise, so the surface got progressively more detailed just by increasing the tesselation when you moved closer.
Presumably, now the process of adding new terrain pieces, with erosion, and strata, and scree, and so on, and otherwise influenced base terrain, for future environments, will to a great degree be a relatively straightforward and fast-ish matter for the art department, with guidance and procgen rule set creation from the resident geologist(s), rather than a series of complicated, and possibly multi-pass tasks for the mathematicians to figure out; And presumably the JIT generation of such base terrain will take exactly as much processing as current terrain does, using the exact same, single, content-agnostic compositing algorithm... (EDIT: Still devasted about the baby-bathwater situation, though...)
A good deal of your last posts on the forums were jabs aimed at people that do find Odyssey running good enough.
For example, in an on-foot cz i get 45+ FPS (1080p, every single setting maxed out) - it's decent enough for me and fluid enough.
Sure, i could get way more than that by lowering some settings, but why should i bother if 45+ is good enough for me?
And since i played more than 3000 hours on XB, i'm actually quite content with anything above 30 fps - it doesnt detract from my experience IF the fps is stable.
Sure, some people will snob out and claim the game is not playable for them at anything below 60fps, in which case i would advise them to check back in 6 months and in the mean time, NMS is that direction
I have seen the file , im unable to access it , its a shader archive , inside is all the original shader files but I cant get in , if you know to access it do tell ,because im betting I could shave a few fps off render time if I could access it .
problem is , Some people like myself , are getting 15 fps on ground without modifying the terrain settings , I got horizons for free on epic , played it saw the fps was 30 on the ground on high , figured the expansion will run the same , like every expansion / DLC ever and I bought odyssey saw that the fps was garbage , heard the team is going to get odyssey back to horizons level performance so waited yet here are 1 year later ,and im still getting 15 fps on low settings , which is , if they would just include a lower quality terrain shader , exactly like the one used for horizons this would solve that problemA good deal of your last posts on the forums were jabs aimed at people that do find Odyssey running good enough.
For example, in an on-foot cz i get 45+ FPS (1080p, every single setting maxed out) - it's decent enough for me and fluid enough.
Sure, i could get way more than that by lowering some settings, but why should i bother if 45+ is good enough for me?
And since i played more than 3000 hours on XB, i'm actually quite content with anything above 30 fps - it doesnt detract from my experience IF the fps is stable.
Sure, some people will snob out and claim the game is not playable for them at anything below 60fps, in which case i would advise them to check back in 6 months and in the mean time, NMS is that direction
If you're getting 30fps in horizons, i really question your toaster.
lol yeah well that was on high settings , but yeah it is old and a little slow ,I would love to but unfortunately I'm atleast 180ms away from the nearest server , and my bank thinks geforce now is a scam so declines my card , also I'm not technically supposed to have access to it , have to use a VPN to use it , plus the screen goes all blurry randomly due to the distance from the server , otherwise I'd use it for sure
