Congratulations on getting better than what CIG's own telemetry says such GPUs get on average.
I'm not saying you're lying of course. CIG's own data states you're lying though
RSI Public Telemetry
robertsspaceindustries.com
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
Lucky us the helmet flash-light is powerful enough to light the planet enough to see the scenery once in a while.
I think we have to give credit to Gologt there for the increase in viewership of SC content vs ED, NMS, EvE, etc
That's some dedication right there.
The R9 5900x is doing you well, I'm not suprised you're getting decent frames
Well yes for most of games it is combination with CPU and GPU. Hefty enough CPU helps a lot.The R9 5900x is doing you well, I'm not suprised you're getting decent frames
yeah, that's the key, right now starcitizen is more CPU than GPU, Im waiting for vulkan to see how it goesThe R9 5900x is doing you well, I'm not suprised you're getting decent frames
a good advice, thank you!
Like I said - 5900X and 1070:
Imagine buying a 5900X and only getting 42FPS average in a game, damn.
Last edited:
Well it is average, individual systems may differ somewhat. Depending on what kind of components, what kind of back load and so on...Like I said - 5900X and 1070:
Imagine buying a 5900X and only getting 42FPS average in a game, damn.
That's how averages work.
For example, I have always preferred to have fast system, I minimise background services and try to reserve as much power as possible for my tasks...Though I'm somewhat professional when it comes to that. (Network/comp sec engineer)
Never underestimate the spite-pledging power of Elite bad, SC good.
I'll.... ermm... well... ...my friend said that they'd make their own...
...erm...
...I'll see myself out... again...............
looks like you need some help here, this system organizes each component based on a score, it is not strange to find the same component (for example a 3080ti - GPU score 325 / 425 etc) in different boxes of the table since this score can have lttle variations according to each case, believe it or not the truth is that my pc with a gtx1070 (GPU score 150 - CPU score 300) gives an average of 48.7 making the game completely playable, we'll see how things change with vulkan, but for now I am satisfied with the experience that the game gives me with this old GPULike I said - 5900X and 1070:
Imagine buying a 5900X and only getting 42FPS average in a game, damn.
Last edited:
That telemetry is taking the average from the R9 3900x + the 1070 though, I get slightly higher because of the 3070ti and 64 Gb of system ram even though I only run an R7 3700x and I run SC at 1440p on ultra settings. As with all PC bits and pieces averages, there's too many variables to be accurate with such a generalised mapping system.
Last edited:
Lucky us the helmet flash-light is powerful enough to light the planet enough to see the scenery once in a while.
I think we have to give credit to Gologt there for the increase in viewership of SC content vs ED, NMS, EvE, etc
That's some dedication right there.
There's a difference between a light source and a sun. I have seen the video where they flew through the surface of the sun and to the interior. Technically if you consider a sun as just a light source yes they have one, but you don't burn up when you get to close and they don't have prominences and flares and you can just fly your ship right through it, so it is not properly modeled as a star. Now really that wouldn't be an issue if you weren't able to fly up to and inside it, plenty of games have a light source as sun but it's pretty poor in a space ship flying game to do that, but it works find in RDR2 and etc.
It doesn't run faster on any of my 2Tb 970 evos, never mind that overpriced and discontinued piece of silicon rubbish
Last edited:
Amateurs, they should just be selling pictures of the onesie. Promise to deliver it sometime in the future. It's all about pledging!
They do seem to be an ideal citizen.
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/v4t3qm/i_may_have_a_small_problem/
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/v4t3qm/i_may_have_a_small_problem/ib5y4en/
(Let's hope they don't join the conveyor belt of grey market cash outs. Years of perma-alpha can do that to a person
---
Now indulge me mate. Whenever we get a zealous new friend like yourself, it's nice to actually discuss the game itself.
So for example:
- How do you expect the AI to perform in 3.17.2? (Given the addition of the Orison mission and the surface troops.)
- When do you expect 'Static Server Meshing' and Pyro to hit the PU?
- When do you imagine CIG will push the player cap above 50? (And is such a change important to you?)
- What ballpark year would you expect SC to reach an official beta state?
I understand of course that you're absolutely giddy with SC's current state of play
So like, Beta in 5 years would you say? SQ42 in less?
You do! not enough "big"
BUY MOAR BIG STUFF
But totally not pay to win!
Love how they urge OP to spend more and more.
This is your brain on Store Citizen.
As i said, CIG.
None of what you said actually addresses how you should develop a software product. All you did was "But Elite!", and there are plenty of criticisms out there about how FD have developed that game as well. In other words, pointing to a pile of poo and saying your pile of poo is the better pile of poo is not a good look.
One thing you most definitely don't do is create a ton of release level assets before you've even got the fundamentals sorted out. And if you're going to promise people that there will be big space battles with hundreds or thousands of people all in the same area, its probably best to check to see if you can actually do that early on, rather than backsliding and slowly letting your players down 10 years later.
CIG was built on dreams.txt, and what CIG deliver is reality.txt. And the difference between what backers were sold and what is delivered is huge.
Don't get me wrong, what they have delivered (when it works) is cool. Although i'm not a fan of some of their gameplay choices (but that's fine, its totally normal), there are some good things there as well.
But how they've gone about developing the game over the last 10 years is just one ginormous flustercluck.
Last edited: