The numbers on the picture aren't entirely accurate, and most of the time, ELW-s will still be worth more than WWTC-s. However, due to the way payouts are calculated, sufficiently massive water worlds which are terraforming candidates can pay more credits than Earth-likes do. This isn't something new to 2.3, it has been always this way. Said "super-WWTCs" are quite rare though.And to think, Terra WW's are worth more than an ELW, and they are in far greater abundance too. Just obscene.
I know than scan values are set at the time of scanning.
And post 2.3 scans will be worth more, but only count as 50% to your progression.
So can anyone confirm that any lower valued pre 2.3 scans will still count as 100% to your progression?
But my question (in other threads) still goes un-answered about pre-2.3 scans...
So far no-one has even hinted at an answer![]()
This has previously been the case (as far as we can tell...) when exploration payouts have changed. So probably...
Dear gods, if these values were in with 1.0 i'd already be a trillionaire!
Yes, it has. I think the most precise calculation was in the exploration value formula thread by MattG.Great reference guide, thank you!
Regarding the varying scan values, the wikia Explorer page shows that scan values vary by mass. Has that been confirmed? Does anyone know if the credit value scales linearly with mass, or has specific stepped values for mass categories (as shown in the wikia table: Tiny Earth-like = 65000, Medium Earth-like = 67798, Huge Earth-like = 77700). I don't have enough sample exploration and sale data myself to tell.
I'm writing a little function in EDDI that will announce the approximate value of the scanned star/body when you scan it. I'd like for it to be as correct as possible.![]()