Another perfectly good thread, ruined.
Too many people have stockholm syndrome from being subjected to this grindy crap pushing you to do specific things you might otherwise not want to do in every game they play, so they'll try to justify why it's totally not manipulative... <.<Idea of dailies is repulsive to me. Encouraging you to do something you may not want to do. If you just get currency for doing basic gameplay things you can keep doing your own thing and still get something.
What I find amusing about OA’s “estimate” is that it’s based on 12 ARX over the course of a one hour livestream. A livestream that had controller issues, a lot of talking while not playing the game, playing the tutorial which basically amounted to doing almost nothing, visiting one system, flying to a station using Supercruise Assist, landing using the autodocker which now crawls at 50m/s , and destroying three ships.Well, if you believe OA and his '30 hours' finger in the air estimate. Then again, fdev don't always get numbers right so maybe he's correct - 30 hours for 25p isn't a good rate of return.
I guess the best paid ARX gameplay will involve the following activities
CQC or ARENA (That's why earnings are so low)
[...]
In before someone discovers you get no Arx if you're in multicrew.I honestly wouldn't be surprised if Frontier "kinda forgot" to award Arx for playing CQC.
Or else someone finds out you can earn arx by just joining m/c and afkingIn before someone discovers you get no Arx if you're in multicrew.
Simple really. They still want people to pay and buy ARX/Cosmetics. If there is no limit, then most will not bother buying them as some will be able to get 1000's in a few day. 400 a week seems pretty reasonable.I've see quite a few people raise this point, but I am looking for some clarification from anyone that has insight on the design philosophy here.
Many mmo's have what are called Daily's.
These are unique activities you perform on a daily basis to earn a modest in-game reward. It's a check - in model that consumes about 20 minutes of time, and the rewards are valuable enough to grind toward a skin or achievement title that many players will complete them.
Daily's are pretty well known as a last gasp of an mmo trying to secure player log ins, and provide the player with in-game events communications.
Capping ARX to 400/week feels very much like a Daily structure to me.
There is an active core player base that might grind more than 400 ARX in a week, but my hypothesis is that is not a huge number - and many of those folks probably already dropped cash to get the skins they want.
So what is the upside on the cap?
Regulation is almost certainly coming and the ban hammer could extend to all forms of in game purchases. I think this is either a lucky coincidence or a shrewd move on FD’s part as they can simply remove the paid element and pursue other routes of income.Parliament my a.. ahh.. you know. It's the job of the parents to regulate what their kids are doing. If they can't do that, they shouldn't be parents. Plain and simple.
</nannystate forever>
---
As for why 400... give me a dollar. Give me another dollar tomorrow. At what point are you going to get tired of giving me a dollar.
The Arx cap exists to keep people from freeloading for free stuff.
Generally I'd agree with you, but... it's FD we're talking about.What I find amusing about OA’s “estimate” is that it’s based on 12 ARX over the course of a one hour livestream. A livestream that had controller issues, a lot of talking while not playing the game, playing the tutorial which basically amounted to doing almost nothing, visiting one system, flying to a station using Supercruise Assist, landing using the autodocker which now crawls at 50m/s , and destroying three ships.
If we can earn 9 ARX for undocking at one station, and docking at another, then my own estimate, pulled out of my own ARX, is that we should be able to earn about 135 ARX/hour... or 400 ARX for three hours of play. Maybe more if they also include activities like completing missions, trading, combat, gathering mats, and so on.
Nah, for consistency with Exploration, being in the second seat in multicrew should earn you zero Arx.Or else someone finds out you can earn arx by just joining m/c and afking![]()
Regulation is almost certainly coming and the ban hammer could extend to all forms of in game purchases. I think this is either a lucky coincidence or a shrewd move on FD’s part as they can simply remove the paid element and pursue other routes of income.
Regulation for loot boxes and other such gambling abusive practices, not for in game additional purchases.Regulation is almost certainly coming and the ban hammer could extend to all forms of in game purchases. I think this is either a lucky coincidence or a shrewd move on FD’s part as they can simply remove the paid element and pursue other routes of income.
I think FD are an advert for how to do in game purchases correctly and i’d hope any regulation would take this into account. However the games industry has pushed way past what could be considered reasonable and a simple fix for a governing body would be to ban it across the board.Regulation is not desired here, and I will gladly rally others to cease funding any political office holder or seeker who would seek to do so, as well as call for the resignation or recall of any office holder who does.
Stops them being pulled into Parliament with other companies and being asked why they try to get children to play excessive hours on the game? Is the responsible thing to do when you know there are people with addiction issues in the community? That kind of thing. Being a responsible company.
a socially responsible profit making organisation. Not many companies set out to do otherwise, though some are more successful than others.Are you saying FDev wants to be seen as a socially responsible insteads of a profit making organisation?
And you think these kids are going to be playing 30h not to rank for that awesome Cutter but because they are after those sweet, sweet 25p? Kids walk around with E700 smart phones, you think they care about earning almost a whole pence per hour? I know this community is old, but it really isn't the 1830s anymore...
And then other people start talking about parliament, sanctions, addiction? lol.
EA,2k and more worryingly Bethusda! I like to see this nipped in the bud before The Elder Scrolls gets ruined!a socially responsible profit making organisation. Not many companies set out to do otherwise, though some are more successful than others.