Notice A statement on cheating in Elite Dangerous.

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.

ryan_m

Banned
Not entirely, although of course the community isn't one person. But the people who don't believe FD whenever they say something should stop demanding FD say something.

Wouldn't be a Frontier Forums thread without baseless cheating accusations being thrown around to defame the greatest PvP group to ever play the game.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When it comes to taking actions against accounts we have identified as using cheats, we review every report on a case by case basis.

Why bother being lenient? Many other MMOs just perma-ban anyone caught cheating and then it's up to account holders to defend their actions, not the other way around.
Only through the threat of instant perma-ban would anyone seriously worry about using cheats with long established accounts, any kind of strike/warning system is too relaxed and only encourages cheaters to test the waters.
 
Just leaving this here:

In infosec (information security) we roughly divide software & services companies in two main groups:

The ones that say "trust us, your privacy and security is very important to us", but provide no details on what or how.

And there are the ones that provide details: how they do data encryption, what algorithm is being used, how passwords and keys are managed, provide incident response metrics, publish public post-incident reports, etc.

The ones in the second one are the ones you trust. Those in the first almost certainly don't know what they're doing.
 
Out of curiosity, how many of you "This is terrible, Frontier, TERRIBLE!" people actually experienced cheating yourself? Seems all this "The cheaters are coming, the cheaters are coming!" panic was created because someone created a thread with a link to a video / article about cheating, not because we're all dying to CMDRs with infinite shields.

Am I wrong?

Our group was under sustained botting attack for about 5 months or so, second half of last year. Wrecked the work of years. Reported continuously to Frontier Support and got either questions that suggested they didn't understand what we were reporting, silly comments about "professional players" and similar boilerplate as Paige posted at the beginning of this thread.
 
machine learning is actually programing something, just different. and while i guess we're not really far away from this, i doubt that a company that's not willing cough up a few extra servers even for load issues on release day will want to hire the resources to feed such an analysis (are you even suggesting in realtime?), let alone pioneering such an effort after (apparently) failing to explore any other more traditional, cheaper and proven approaches. that's a big leap of faith, both in frontier and in ai.

yes, indeed, ai is the future, it has already changed the present, but it's still a while until it can be a magic substitute for bad design, indolence or incompetence. sorry if that sounds harsh.
Once again I am begging you for your cogent technical assessment.

Is it technically challenging to add ship stats to the packets being sent from the player side computer to FDEV during gameplay?

Is it technically challenging to do a comparison of these stats to the range of possible values for a given ship?

Is it technically challenging to autoban players to the dark solo mode whose ship stats fall outside of the range of allowable values?

Is it technically challenging to autogenerate a support ticket for players subject to this autoban?

Forgive my lack of technical expertise here - but how do these third part cheats theoretically work?

Do they modify ship stats, or do they zero out incoming damage effects?

Or is it some other form of coding voodoo unrelated to asset properties?
 
Is it technically challenging to add ship stats to the packets being sent from the player side computer to FDEV during gameplay?

Is it technically challenging to do a comparison of these stats to the range of possible values for a given ship?

Is it technically challenging to autoban players to the dark solo mode whose ship stats fall outside of the range of allowable values?
1. No

2. No

3. No; BUT: any cheat/hack worth its salt will fix up the stats to allowable values before they are being sent to FDev, and only apply the cheat values internally / against peers.

Basically if the code runs in an uncontrolled environment, the environment controls what happens. As an outsider there's very little you can do about it.

That's not to say that there aren't many feasible approaches to do exactly what you suggest in Elite; namely: automatic detection, reporting, and enforcement of certain types of cheating. Although some care must be taken with that last point; false-positives are always a thing.
 
Hey Paige Harvey!
Cheaters are not the only problem. Our community is also very disappointed with bots participating in PP and BGS. For instance, almost 20-30 cycles we have been pushed to expanse in unprofitable system BD-10 5238 (100 000 merits each cycle!) Also in BGS we face same bot ships with huge, unhuman amounts of influence as well as huge amount of traffic in the system. Those bot CMDRs have already been seen and been reported to you by another power participants, and nothing have been done so far, unfortunately.

Funny that botters are complaining about botters. We all know how Grom won the Dangerous games and are actually playing. So I am finding quite funny again the usual botter players are complaining about other botters.
Personally, I think it is a good thing you have a test of your own medecine.
 
So let me see if I understand this correctly...
You cheat, nothing happens then you post a video of said cheating, you get banned to solo where you can continue to cheat and still affect the BGS for other players?

If this is correct then FDev needs help.
 
So let me see if I understand this correctly...
You cheat, nothing happens then you post a video of said cheating, you get banned to solo where you can continue to cheat and still affect the BGS for other players?

If this is correct then FDev needs help.
No. It's a permaban from the game. You have a shadowban timeout (solo with no bgs influence) but that is temp. Caught again = exit. The 'protester' got kicked because this wasn't his first time cheating.
 
Funny that botters are complaining about botters. We all know how Grom won the Dangerous games and are actually playing. So I am finding quite funny again the usual botter players are complaining about other botters.
Personally, I think it is a good thing you have a test of your own medecine.
man, i will be banned from EG Pilots for this, but i will show this
133889
it is from our's discord, 769 pilots right now, many pilots have left community for some reasons, so ~1000 pilots we was have at Dangerous games. And we was working together for Grom. Questions is who can transfer 10000 of merrits per hour at last 15 PP cicles?

P.S. we have logs from Cicle 200 with graph, if command allow me to show, i will post it here
 
Last edited:
Funny that botters are complaining about botters. We all know how Grom won the Dangerous games and are actually playing. So I am finding quite funny again the usual botter players are complaining about other botters.
Personally, I think it is a good thing you have a test of your own medecine.
Lol, please open your eyes. We have people who actually carres about PP and spending their time in it, not bots. And alsow we have logs of enemy botts doing same actions with same behaivior. Thats the difference... I wish FD will do something, all names are known.
 
Last edited:
That always happens in MP gaming. :p
Can't argue with that, lol. although I have to say I'm not worried about 'cheats' in some games. Exploiters for mat gathering, for example, is far less heinous and is obviously also happening in E:D. I know it's poor form to select your evils and tackle only those, but I feel the in E:D the gathering system is so bad that I have no issue with people getting ahead of me by using logging exploits, I really don't. As long as they can't have 4 pips to everything. ;)
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom