After 600 odd hours, no I don't think so.
GC2 is probably one of my alltime 4x faves and have had endless fun with it for years, but Stellaris is insanely deep as all Paradox games, and makes the depth and breadth of GC2 look like a mobile app (only by comparison). It's as much complex sociopolitical experimentation as galactic conquering.
No, we are here. And when we are there, that will also be here. We can never be there, as it instantly becomes here.
Sorry.
After a 1000 hours plus it would seem a bit churlish. Do you ask for a refund on your bread if one ingredient is changed? Swap brands if you must but don't cry me a river.
And then you might be aware of hypocrisy of such arguments - refund "threatments" only rises up when there is a change that you don't like. Imagine the case of "dealer knocking your door and replace your car's seats to better ones" for free, and I guess you'll not demand any refundsAnd I've been party to enough US class action suits to know what I'm talking about. TY
I'm not familiar with EU law sufficiently to comment, but in the US. if there was a large enough base to make it profitable, there would be law firms willing to try this on the merits if this change were to take place.
And I've been party to enough US class action suits to know what I'm talking about. TY
I find the fact that FD is openly polarizing it's own player base on this topic quite disgusting.
Out of curiosity, how many hours do you have in game?I thought the Engineers was as low as it was possible to go in bad game design, but here FD is thinking about changing the basic nature of the game after we bought it.
Not that i really care whether pp is open only or not, but just on the principle that FD shouldnt be rewarded for changing the basic nature of the product from what was advertised and sold, I am thiniking about asking for a refund. This sets a precedent i dont want to see play out.
A vendor removing basic features from a product after its sold and the money is in the vendors pocket seems unethical, maybe fradulent, and possibly illegal.
This just reads off like a sad cry for attention, all this because a completely optional competitive mode (and only that mode) now MIGHT require venturing into multiplayer.
ALLIANCE CHIEFTAIN, GUARDIAN MODULES, WING MISSIONS WEREN'T EITHER ON A KICKSTARTER/ORIGINAL GAME. HOW DARE THEM TO CHANGE/IMPROVE THE PRODUCT. REFUNDFD shouldnt be rewarded for changing the basic nature of the product from what was advertised and sold
So weird how people think they're owed a refund for something they bought years ago and have used for hundreds of hours. Like, I think you at least got your $60 worth dude.
The level of silly emotional outbursts about this is just hilarious.
I don't think the fuss is over the feature, I imagine some are ticked off coz they feel lied to. But forget that lets all laugh at the carebears tears eh?