Maybe my previous statement was not accurate. What I meant is that, to a certain extent, we don’t have to care too much about whether they are “endangered animals”. I agree that more endangered species should be used to call for the protection of animals, but sometimes, we can be flexible. I personally think that “endangered species” + “common species in zoos” is a good combination.
Really?! I've looked through the IUCN and I think there were none that where endangered, the only one was the large-antlered muntajc, but they have never been kept in captivity if zootierliste is correct.