MarcWP, KiryuCPR, could you two please stop arguing? Who the crud cares if a dino is accurate or not unless you're a paleoenthusiast? It's the Jurassic Franchise we're talking, none of em are accurate to the bone.
Carcharodontosaurus design:
- Thread starter impcaeaug
- Start date
Exactly mate. He just won't accept it. I find it funny. Hahah. But when he started calling people stupid, I had to prove my point you know.
The way I see it, you two are arguing like silly people over a minor detail.
Can we please calm down a bit, no need for insults.
Oh and one more thing:
If KiryuCPR here can differentiate two species of animals by physical appearance, can he/she differentiate the same animal by just the skeleton? I don't think anyone but an anatomist can differentiate the skeleton of a lion and a tiger.
If KiryuCPR here can differentiate two species of animals by physical appearance, can he/she differentiate the same animal by just the skeleton? I don't think anyone but an anatomist can differentiate the skeleton of a lion and a tiger.
I'm not discrediting anything. I'm just saying, that no one will ever know what these animals looked like, before they are in front of you. The artists will also tell you that themselves. Everything is speculation.
And I'll promise you, that the dinosaurs from Universal will never be accurate. That ship has sailed 30 years ago.
True indeed.
I dunno, Colin said that JW3 would have accurate dinos...
You've got a point, tho. Unless someone can make a time machine/ ressurect dinosaurs properly without any genetic mishaps, we'll never know what dinosaurs look like in real life.
You've got a point, tho. Unless someone can make a time machine/ ressurect dinosaurs properly without any genetic mishaps, we'll never know what dinosaurs look like in real life.
More accurate dinosaurs are great and all, but do you think they'll make the raptors turkey size and with feathers etc?
I don't think they'll ever have the balls to do that. Sorry for the language. It would tear apart the whole franchise.
And I'm all for making the dinosaurs more accurate, but when it doesn't change a thing about the animal, I can't see why the resources should be used on this. It's such a minor detail, that no one would notice. Seems like a waste of time.
Last edited:
The difference between a lion and a tiger is pretty much the same difference as the Carchar and Giga. And they also look different in the game. Just like you pointed out they should. And again almost all of the dinosaurs in the franchise are not accurate bonewise. So why change that with the Carchar. This is fiction not reality. But it is what it is... I'm leaving this thread now. It will NOT be changed, so no point to this madness.
You have problems. These are not and were not meant to be 100% accurate. They are like the dinosaurs in the films, genetic monstrosities created for a theme park. This game is not trying for realism, it is recreating the look of the films. Stop obsessing over the Carcharadontosaurus like it's a personal attack on you that it's not 100% exactly like real life (which we don't know what that was anyway since we don't have the soft tissue that covered the skull and therefore could make it look quite different from what we think it does).
The head is awfully shrinkwrapped in that reconstruction. Otherwise it's mostly fine.
