I'll level with you and tell you straight up that when you say "entitled perspective" with no other context it sounds like you're brusquely discounting their perspective as being from a position of entitlement.
Whether that's what you mean or not, you can't just say "wabdooble friggleberger" and expect anyone to know you meant to extend your deepest condolences for the loss of their grandparents.
If you find your augment of my diction to be aberrant, you're simply absconding from what is perhaps anomalous. Contrary to an antediluvian approach to averring what is a blandishment, I merely descry what I explicatively believe to be endemic to my being. I attempt to exculpate what is exorbitant through an innocuous channel. If you find it irascible, fine, that is better than noisome sealing of one's perspective.
Now then, I will "level" with you, as well.
People express themselves differently, there will be inevitable fractures between people and language was meant to speak one's mind. However, through that translation, people make value-assumption and background assumptions all the time. Which is why there needs to be a diverse community to ensure the accuracy of human endeavors that involve linguistics, which is pretty much everything.
I have to right to express myself the way I see reasonable and you do too, which is why you are entitled to post what you did and I still hold respect for you. I get it, human nature is driving you to expel any sort of differences, but overcoming that is precisely what makes people humans.
If one truly had an issue and was concerned about what I mean, I am more than happy to explain it to him/her/it.
So two points here:
1. I think the only people that have a better grasp of English vocab are probably English Master/Doctorate, of course there are exceptions, but I already use vocab sparingly.
2. I take your suggestion into consideration but I feel that the compromise between myself and the person I communicate with is fine as it is. You and I have background assumptions each other and they are forcing an extra subjective mindset on each of us, so I prefer that we try to ameliorate that problem and move on from that point. Language do have general meanings, but as an individual it should be personalized since it is for personal uses. I believe I am conveying what I am attempting to convey, and lapses are inevitable, I will amend them as I get to know my partners of converse later on, since they are diverse like you and I.
But if you want to keep complaining about it, you should, because you are exerting your force upon the people around you as you should according to Nietzsche. I appreciate the comment.
Topic wise:
Yep, definitely turning into an open/solo group discussion. But hey, unless we get people to understand where they are coming from individually and why every post deserves the same respect, accusation or support, as long as there is no profanity/flaming involved. If the simple concept of reconciliation doesn't proliferate, the conflict will be endless.
