Complaint about BETA

I wouldn't pay to test some one else's product.

And that's your choice. I probably won't bother paying for it next time out, but we have a choice. No one forced you to buy it. Nobody forced me. But it only cost me £5, a pound more than the iced coffee I just drank. So not a major issue for me. If you find it an issue, well that's yours.
 
The fact they are doing a 50/50 split this time between "closed" and then "open" betas shows that previous betas left up to those who bought it (beta access) as part of the old Horizon deal (plus backers) just isn't enough machines or players providing feedback (because players drop off over time, or lose interest, or can't be bothered to test anything because they only paid to play with new toys before main release, naturally)

just guessing but imo they started this when they realized they *really* needed some mass testing, and iirc it was because of some extensive changes in the networking code (they even said it). aggressive optimizations are dangerous and the type and number of bugs that were reported that week really freaked me out, but it anyhow ended well.

the reason this time around for going open beta? no idea. wait and see ...
 
And that's your choice. I probably won't bother paying for it next time out, but we have a choice. No one forced you to buy it. Nobody forced me. But it only cost me £5, a pound more than the iced coffee I just drank. So not a major issue for me. If you find it an issue, well that's yours.

It's more about the principle of the matter.

I've bought all the weapon colours, all but one engine colour, two ship kits (Anaconda/Corvette), lots of paint jobs for various ships, a flight suit, lots of paint jobs for SRVs, paint jobs for fighters, and the female pilot bobble-head... and I'm now debating to get the Sol bobble set... all of that probably equates to a whole new game and the expansion - this is fine, however, as many of us accept that cosmetics are real-money transactions, but they are not a nescecary (pay-to-win) part of the game - there are many of them and we can use them as much as we want, and individually they are all pretty cheap.

I and many others have the money to buy Beta access if we want to, but in the history of gaming, 99% of all games in the market have always run "open" betas - the fact that Frontier even sold beta access is anathema to the principles of online gaming - because of this hugely negative choice of Frontier "money grabbing", as many of us see it, we do not and will not buy access to any betas.

You wouldn't buy a car with two flat tires and then thank the salesman for it - and the same goes for paying for beta.

Sure, I'll get in the car and test it on two flat tires for you and then give you the results, but if you expect me to pay for that "privilege" you can get ......... *naughty words* lol...
 
yes because its content that needs to be tested for bugs. If they can perfect that without beta testing then they don't need to test anything else because they can do the same with it as well. It's a facade. Read the whole thing, don't skim it.

The Thargoid stuff will be tested in house. It is too vital to the game to be tested by casual normal players. There are lots of QOL things for us regular beta testers to test out.

What is a facade is your arrogance and patronizing attitude.
 
Whilst the aliens are the headline, there's going to be a bunch of other things that need testing.

I'm willing to bet we're going to get the first tweaks looking forward to the crime and punishment changes. There's also likely to be new planetary features and missions, especially expanding on the chained missions that need to be done.

That there is an open beta this time suggests that there's stuff that needs a lot of data gathering, and that does look like it's going to be C&P changes. If that's true, we'll be busy enough complaining about that for 4-6 weeks.

C&P wouldn't be effected by Thargoids but would definitely need more testing than them anyway since it's going to impact everyone.

FD might seem like they're flailing around when it comes to betas, but everything they've done with the Thargoids has worked. It's when they start fiddling with bigger systems that it gets knotty.

Besides, I doubt very much we're going to be able to anything but die or barely get away for a quite a while, because those anti Thargoid weapons won't come about without at least some community involvement.
 
Last edited:
It's more about the principle of the matter.

I've bought all the weapon colours, all but one engine colour, two ship kits (Anaconda/Corvette), lots of paint jobs for various ships, a flight suit, lots of paint jobs for SRVs, paint jobs for fighters, and the female pilot bobble-head... and I'm now debating to get the Sol bobble set... all of that probably equates to a whole new game and the expansion - this is fine, however, as many of us accept that cosmetics are real-money transactions, but they are not a nescecary (pay-to-win) part of the game - there are many of them and we can use them as much as we want, and individually they are all pretty cheap.

I and many others have the money to buy Beta access if we want to, but in the history of gaming, 99% of all games in the market have always run "open" betas - the fact that Frontier even sold beta access is anathema to the principles of online gaming - because of this hugely negative choice of Frontier "money grabbing", as many of us see it, we do not and will not buy access to any betas.

You wouldn't buy a car with two flat tires and then thank the salesman for it - and the same goes for paying for beta.

Sure, I'll get in the car and test it on two flat tires for you and then give you the results, but if you expect me to pay for that "privilege" you can get ......... *naughty words* lol...

That's just not true. 99% of all other games that got funded via kickstarter do it EXACTLY like Frontier does it: Giving beta access to those who paid for beta. (actually 99% of all other games don't run any betas at all...)
Later lots of people complained on the forums that they missed kickstarter and would gladly pay for beta. Frontier listened to them and made it available one year after release. They actually did these people a favour and listened to the community. If you don't want to pay for it, don't. But don't try to take it away from those who want it. Either go for the later date and join the Open beta or ignore it.

I think that's quite a selfish attitude you have there. You either want to take beta away from those who funded the game or you want to take the option away for those who will gladly pay for it, and you aren't even involved, or interested or anything. Just because you don't like the concept. Because it's against your principle. I'd say your principle is morally wrong.
 
Last edited:
Actually there have been several betas that didn't include all the coming content, the engineers being the most recent one I can think of that omitted several things that were in the general release.

I'm not sure if you've been playing since the very beginning but if not you are making a big assumption about what content is included in the beta testing and if you WERE in right from the off your memory is faulty.
 
Last edited:
How do you "test" a story?

i dont think they can actually test it through since DBOBE stated it will come in dribs and drabs , so there would be a beta for every single part of the story which will be aired all over youtube and the forums.

Sorry OP but i just dont agree with what you propose.
 
Now I know many of you that may reply to this will be fanboi's of the company "can do no wrong and if they do it's got reasons behind it and it's still okay." and " You just want to see the spoiled stuff." But you're missing the point here.

This is my favourite part of your rant, Basically anyone who disagrees with you is a Frontier fanboi.

Great stuff.

1951130.jpg
 
OP, since you keep claiming no one has actually read you post, I will break it down...

I've taken part in multiple BETAs and every single time that I have been apart of them 100% of "new material" is present. The point of BETA is to test all aspects of the "new content" Not to cause people to think they are testing something when they aren't.
As someone who works in the software industry, I can attest that that's not the way betas actually work in practice. Our early betas frequently have certain areas turned off, that aren't yet ready for testing. Ever since the rise of the Internet, the concepts of alpha, beta, and shipping release have been muddled. Most products these days seem to be in perpetual beta.

It's a rip off for the people who payed the 15 dollars to have the BETA access for this game. The only things that are being tested are "patch" worthy thing. They constantly "lock" the new stuff so it's not played in the "BETA". It's a ruse to get more money out of the people that's it.

I'll decide if I personally feel ripped off, thank you. I don't. I'm glad that I have been able to beta test, even though I wasn't part of the kickstarter. I've gotten my money's worth, by test driving ships I couldn't afford and don't want to grind rank for. I've filled in plenty of bug reports and given feedback for the betas. If you don't like the idea of paid betas, don't pay for it or wait for the open access betas.

The BETA should include the new Thargoid stuff and any other new nuances.

Respectfully, I disagree most strongly. If the new Thargoid content were present, the Internet would be overrun with spoilers within a few days. That would completely ruin the update for all the non-beta players, who paid for the full game.

I seriously question them that why do they need a BETA if they can "perfect" the "locked" content without having it BETA tested? What are you actually testing? The Game has already been out for X amount of time and the server load tests should already be done, not RE TESTED!

There will be a lot of changes to the base code, which needs testing, assuming this beta is like the others. I look forward to reviewing the changelog (but then, I'm a programmer who enjoys this sort of thing).

Now I know many of you that may reply to this will be fanboi's of the company "can do no wrong and if they do it's got reasons behind it and it's still okay." and " You just want to see the spoiled stuff." But you're missing the point here. This isn't about seeing the "new" stuff. This is about testing everything to make sure it's up to speck and report any bugs. If they don't need it BETA tested then why even have a BETA for anything? They can do the same perfection they do for the "locked" stuff to the patches as well. It's fools gold with no shine.

While I am a fan of this game, I'm no white knight (read some of my posts on antialiasing or UI colors). I feel that it is you who is missing the point. There will be lots of changes which still need testing.

Knock it off Frontier or stop doing the BETAs or it's just a glorified "Early access but lose your data after X day/weeks/months". Which IS NOT a BETA.

It is a beta of the changes. Sometimes I wish that my progression would transfer, like all the engineered upgrades I got for fish, but mostly, I'm glad it doesn't transfer.

I don't hate Frontier I am saying I disagree with their approach. I do realize that none of us own this game but have a license to play it. That Frontier owns it and they can do whatever they want with it and they can use the word/term "BETA" out of definition and practice as they want. But it doesn't mean their practice is right just because they "do it" and haven't been forced to stop through lawsuit (not a threat just saying).

As I mentioned earlier, the definition of "beta" has changed, due to the influence of the Internet. It's time to stop living in the past.

OP does not understand the software industry at all. A beta test is a test of what the developer decides and nothing to do with him.

The attitude is quite normal, seen it many times before. Entitlement is an ugly trait and op should read the terms of beta access beforehand as he has no argument.

I agree, 100%. Rep++

It's clear you're lying to yourself because I said it has nothing to do with "spoiling" anything in the story but has to do with testing everything and reporting the bugs. I am "focusing" on the 2.4 thing specifically because I have had enough of their retoric and this is talking about the present to the future. We can't do anything about the past ones. I just finally decided to speak up about it. And no I can't link them because I don't write them here I post them do the customer support email for beta reporting for this game as I do with all other MMO BETA testing I have done. Forums aren't good places to report these. Since it's player mod ran rather than the Devs. Even if Devs post on here this isn't their source of bug reports.

It has everything to do with avoiding "spoiling" the game for regular players. We will test the stuff FD thinks needs testing.

I don't agree with redefining things. I never will and never have. Original definitions ONLY. Not budging.

I see. Have you mounted your buggy whip on the wall, or are you still using it to beat a dead horse? :D

No I know exactly what BETA testing is. And it has nothing to do with what you stated. It has everything to do with testing a complete product for potential code breaking areas/ broken code areas. It also is used for stress tests. There a myriad of things that are done with BETA. However you can't do an accurate BETA testing in video games without having a complete product because if you only give part of it the unknown variable that wasn't tested it could break the code that was BETA tested again in other ways or maybe the fixes won't work. When adding any code it has the potential to mess with other coding that is already stable. Hence bugs pop up in areas that were already perfectly okay when new coding is introduced into the formula. Also as I stated it's not about wanting to know the story early it has everything to do with testing the produce to report the bugs. For someone who's so attackative and dismissive and "this is typical" why don't you look at yourself Mr/Mrs high and mighty. You obviously didn't read the entire post.

As you can see, I have read your whole post. While you are correct, this isn't a beta test of the full product, including the Thargoid content would ruin the story for many players, so it is completely appropriate to do a partial beta test in this case.

I assure you that I am much older than you think. And age has nothing to do with it. Kind funny how if you guys think "well a grown person would never say that." or "act like that" so "he/she must be young. That is the answer to all questionings of wonder." Guess what everyone is unique and there is no prescribed formula or robot tendency of "you must conform to this exact image every single one of you. BE ROBOTS NOW OR YOUR YOUNG." Is it you who is what is the common phrase.....12??? or is it a newborn???

Umm... OK, then you should act your age. :D

have read everything said and I have commented accordingly. Maybe you lack the cognitive ability to have conversations? Maybe you can't understand?

I understand completely. You can't wait to see the Thargoid content and you are so selfish that you don't care if that ruins the story for all the non-beta players.

I love how the truth actually is, you PAID for the BETA because you WANTED early access. Thats what it is. Why pay for a BETA? Ive always said BETA should be available to everyone for free because its about fixing bugs, more people, more coverage. Frankly i think anyone who paid for BETA access is just as daft as the people who fund those early access survival shovel ware games that are pumped out on a weekly basis but thats me.

However, its quite obvious you are just whinging because you want first look content, not to help FD squash the issues. You want Thargoids.

If you can't understand why all the Thargoid content wouldn't be available In BETA to be poured out onto forums/reddit/social media/youtube before its actually out i think you are beyond reasoning with.

True. Rep++

You utterly missed the point. Yes, a beta is to test, but the developer decides what is to be tested. Always has, always will. Nothing about beta actually says testing a full complete product anymore.

Just because you decide that their beta should include everything, doesn't mean they have to do it. They decide what gets tested.

Exactly. Rep++

This isn't a patch but an update. All updates have had beta. This is an update not a patch and will get a beta due to the extra stuff that needs testing. Patches are there to fix the issues that have been found and shouldn't need beta testing.

Also I don't want all the thargoid stuff ruined for me or others with it being in beta.

Agreed. Rep++

Why do you think that your definition of beta is correct? A beta is unfinished/untested code. The betas that FD run contain unfinished/untested code - just because they contain a lot of released code also doesn't make them any less a beta.

I don't even understand what you are asking for. You don't want to play a beta? Don't. You want it to be called something else? Call it what you like, I doubt it will bother anyone else.

Right. Rep++

I've read the OP's post twice (just so I don't miss anything) and I disagree.

The beta testing we pay for is completely optional and it's only 1 of several stages that Frontier do. It's entirely up to the developer which parts are tested by the public. I don't think the new Thargoid story content should be in the beta and I'm glad it isn't.

If you don't like how paid-for public betas are done then don't pay for it in the future.

My opinion.

And mine. Rep++

Quality was and is still a problem (GalMap-Bug for example in 2.3). But with the history of Premium Beta, the amount of tickets sent to FD and the well... high amount of bugs that made it into the final release (some of them still present) it was clearly shown that a public beta didn´t help too much.

So my conclusion is: FD´s ressources are limited and the amount of bugs found in the game will always be higher than the amount of bugs they are being able to fix. That´s not uncommon in software development. Customers have to live with it. I don´t like it but of course I don´t have a better solution to the situation.

Unfortunately, true. Rep++

Hate on betas because fdev doesn't understand the point of one. Not because they aren't spoiling their narrative in them.

Ie. In a beta, you fix the bugs that are reported.
Ie. In a beta, you don't introduce more features after the beta closes.
Ie. In a beta, the last beta should be the next release

That's why you should hate betas for this game

1) If possible. Not all bugs can be fixed in a limited timeframe.
2) Ideally, but not unheard of.
3) No, that's the last "release candidate", not the last beta.

Nope not what I said at all. I said I want frontier to run real BETAs not the mockery half backed rediculous display of what they call a BETA which isn't a BETA. You can go play ANY MMO that does BETAs and they release 100% of expansions during the BETA testing phase.

You're entitled to your opinion, but it's only a name. FD can call it what they like.

But my point on that is that if they can perfect the content they withhold then there is no reason to do a BETA. They can perfect without player participation. We don't need to BETA test around old content. BETA tests ALL new data not just part of it. All new coding can effect previous coding in ways they didn't forsee. If they're going to do a BETA do it right or not at all.

Betas test whatever the developer thinks needs testing. While the Thargoid content also needs testing, especially since the Alien Ruins debacle, FD has chosen to keep that testing in-house. I respect their decision.

See, this is why I have never bought access for "Betas" from Frontier - if they want test-bed machines, they can bloody well let us test it for free like any other game on the market...

It's not like they don't have any money to support the game, you know...


The fact they are doing a 50/50 split this time between "closed" and then "open" betas shows that previous betas left up to those who bought it (beta access) as part of the old Horizon deal (plus backers) just isn't enough machines or players providing feedback (because players drop off over time, or lose interest, or can't be bothered to test anything because they only paid to play with new toys before main release, naturally) - because of this, every patch in Horizons has been a complete fracking disaster - and they know it, hence they are keeping their part of their "bargain" by allowing a closed beta, but are also allowing everyone else to actually test it, too.

Sorry, but I respectfully disagree. I think FD has added an open beta, due in large part to feedback on this forum.

Also, all the Thargoid content that has appeared so far has been tested extremely well internally by Frontier - so I don't expect that to be too bad on release.

What I really hate is Thargoid/Storyline content being spoiled by poeple because the Betas showed too much when it wasn't supposed to.

Agreed. I don't want that either. Rep++

This is my favourite part of your rant, Basically anyone who disagrees with you is a Frontier fanboi.

Why should this thread be different from all the others? :D If you disagree with (any) OP, you're a fanboi, a white knight, a ganker, etc. We should avoid name-calling or this thread will get locked. (Which might not be a bad thing.) Rep++
 
Last edited:
OP. I sincerely hope FD do not release all the new content for beta testers. I already have to avoid Youtube all day Monday 'cos of muppets posting Game of Thrones spoilers before the UK's episode that evening. If FD allowed full access to beta, I'd have to take a 3 month break from YT to avoid spoilers. No thanks.
 
That's just not true. 99% of all other games that got funded via kickstarter do it EXACTLY like Frontier does it: Giving beta access to those who paid for beta. (actually 99% of all other games don't run any betas at all...)
Later lots of people complained on the forums that they missed kickstarter and would gladly pay for beta. Frontier listened to them and made it available one year after release. They actually did these people a favour and listened to the community. If you don't want to pay for it, don't. But don't try to take it away from those who want it. Either go for the later date and join the Open beta or ignore it.

I think that's quite a selfish attitude you have there. You either want to take beta away from those who funded the game or you want to take the option away for those who will gladly pay for it, and you aren't even involved, or interested or anything. Just because you don't like the concept. Because it's against your principle. I'd say your principle is morally wrong.

Sorry, are you talking about vanilla Elite: Dangerous that promised beta as part of the kickstarter deal? Because I'm on about the game once it went gold and its subsequent expansion and the fact they continued to sell "Beta" as a cash cow - it isn't a kickstarter anymore if it has already been released for a year and has an expansion tacked onto it for the last two. Defend the game all you want (well, Frontier's sales team), but using the kickstarter brick when the game has almost finished it's final phase of its first expansion means it is no longer deserving of a kickstart badge when it has been hugely succesful and has been released on 3 platforms...

Hundreds of games over the last decade and more have always asked their playerbase to participate in beta access - some allowed everyone in, others in an email lottery - never have I known a game (that wasn't started through kickstarter, by the way) to actually sell "Beta" testing as a product (edit; or tacked onto kick-starters as something to entice buyers) - you are paying for a product that doesn't work 100% and are providing, potentially (though questionably considering all it takes is money rather than being a fan), some form of feedback (no matter the quality of it), and my principle, you say, is morally wrong?

So, let me get this straight... I'm the one that's morally wrong (so strong) for not wanting to buy a product that doesn't work 100% (two flat tires), yet uses up my valuable free time to test and provide feedback?

what-meme-4.jpg
No.
 
Last edited:
So, let me get this straight... I'm the one that's morally wrong (so strong) for not wanting to buy a product that doesn't work 100% (two flat tires), yet uses up my valuable free time to test and provide feedback?

I think you misunderstood slightly. The morally wrong bit wasn't about you not wanting to buy beta access, but suggesting that no-one else should be able to do so because you object to it on principle. Morally wrong is probably a bit strong, but I absolutely agree that it is up to each individual whether they want to buy into beta access or not. I certainly don't see what is wrong with selling beta access - you are being told exactly what you are buying.
 
  • Like (+1)
Reactions: NW3
Back
Top Bottom