I will never get the "mods can break the game argument" . The Sims Franchise survived for 20+ years now. The trainwreck that is Sims 4 can only be supported over 6 years, because it has mods that makes the game INTERESTING.
Easy, TheSims franchise is not popular because of the mods. There are tons of people playing the game without mods. Maybe you think the game is a trainwreck but "can only be supported over 6 years because is had mods" is just not true. When there's no competition or successor, some themed games will remain relevant. The Sims is part of many top 10 franchise lists of all time, maybe not fair to compare such a popular franchise with other games.
While using a mod is your own risk, breaking your modded savegame/losing your progress is very common when an update happens.
I think TheSims4 is the exception with disabling your mods like that - the common rule is that you lose (a great part of) your progress.
Tbf, a lot of games don't allow you to disable the mods easily, especially script-heavy ones.
I've seen an example of someone who couldn't start a new game because a corrupted modded savegame in the cloud was causing issues. Actually making the game useless.
Don't think that Frontier support isn't waiting to fix situations caused by other parties.
With PZ Franchise mode, modders can ruin other franchises with putting modded animals on the market (you can't stop this) and I don't want to buy modded animals in that mode.
Modded could also mean good stats animals, modded albino mutation and not just new species.
I just hope it doesn't become like Planet Coaster and Jurassic World where they suddenly give up on it and no mention that's what they have done
Ehm, you realize this is what almost every dev does with singleplayer games (online different story)? Don't expect Frontier to do this differently. Announcing that they stop support or announcing the last DLC, that's very rare. Would be nice to get this notification but don't get your hopes up when the time is near.
To be clear, last year seen this with a game I own, I really appreciated it and most from the community as well - so I agree with you. There's always a group that feel entitled to longer support or DLC.
That's how I feel. As much as I might wish Frontier released more animals, they have a brand and intellectual property to protect and reasonably won't want often low/lower standard animals being associated with the game.
I would rather wait for the animals they make than use mods for now.
Also when modders create an animal, sometimes it wouldn't make sense to buy a DLC. I agree with your post, in the end it's their property.
Same here, rather wait for the animals. I am going to mention your 1 month/1 animal idea again, that's something I think would work for a lot of people. Even if those were "clones"
I've seen some comments: "I'm not happy with the game, they should release tools so I get what I want" or "this game looks too much like PC with their building mechanics".
Do some research on this game, features and their DLC models before buying, and don't buy it if it doesn't meet expectations.