That gives me an idea. FD could provide what we're asking here by making an SLF which is the same as a Sidewinder.The in-game description of the Anaconda still has that artifact from its earlier intended design:
Right? The docking bay isn't something you fit and the SLFs just spawn when you launch them, they're an actual part of the ship models that opens and launches the SLFs.Stored as cargo, no, but that's not the heaviest thing you can put in a size 6 - a Prismatic shield, or a 5B limpet controller engineered for Reinforced 5 is 80t which would cover a lightweight Eagle or most Sidewinder or Hauler builds.
With the size 5 bay able to support 80t and the size 7 bay able to carry 320t (reinforced limpet controllers) it wouldn't be unreasonable to suggest that a size 6 bay could hold up to 160t, which would allow even non-lightweight Viper 3 or Courier loadouts too.
The width and height of the docking hatch might be a more significant restriction.
Ah, the difference with what we're talking about is you're imagining something that is compatible with every ship that can load an SLF, and I'm not. In the same way a Python can't support an SLF, a Cutter couldn't support a small ship hangar bay. I'm not convinced the ship models would really support this, as the fighter hangar compatibility is actually associated with real physical space on the ship, and a ship having physical space for an SLF to launch from it doesn't mean it has the space for an Eagle. The Type-9/10 and what we've seen of the "Panther-Clipper LX" model all look to me like they could support a bigger hangar than an SLF, which is part of why I mention them.Cutter also has C8 slots and should therefore be able to fit this module in. Following that logic, every Cutter should also be able to launch a Vulture, much like a Type-9 could.