Something that is unique or unusual, particularly if visually appealing. Here are some helpful tips:
* A planetary nebula BY ITSELF is not particularly interesting
* "Close moons" are also not highly unique, but if it has some exceptional view, that can count
* Ringed ELWs are common enough to not be worth including w/o some other feature
Things worth noting:
* Any system with 3 or more ELWs, particularly if they are binary or trinary
* ELWs orbiting a gas giant
* 6 or more water worlds or ammonia worlds in one system
* M-class or larger (K-class, G-class...) stars with rings
* Codex sites that are in really unusual places, like inside a ring or near a black hole
* Rapidly moving planets, particularly if they cause regular eclipses
* Glowing Green giants! and other really odd colors
* Any moons or planets that collide
* Sites of unusual or surprising beauty
Thanks for this list. Much like Fico74's question that generated this list, I was not sure what was worth posting and what was not. As a new player (2 months in), I find a huge number of 'amazing' finds, but while they are amazing to me they are probably run-of-the-mill to the long-term players who have been out exploring before and therefore have seen most of it before.
Some examples are above, such as close moons, or ringed planets with a 'view' (similar to "The View" but not quite as spectacular), huge mountains similar to the Arkgamanon Range, maybe a few km shorter and more numerous but still impressive. But such mountains are common on some rocky worlds. It takes time to gather and post data & screnshots when there's so much flying and exploring to be done each week, so I want (need) to be selective.
It's the fun of exploring which is slowing me down. I'm only just coming up on WP3!
Just for clarification, by "Codex entries/sites" in the opening post and above, do you mean Geological/Biological/Xenological sites only (i.e. land-based items and Notable Stellar Phenomena)? Stars and planets are all codex entries too of course, but I figure these aren't quite as noteworthy since most types are frequently found, except the ones listed above.
For the submissions to the Google Form, would you (ideally) like every Codex entry logged? Many geological sites pop up quite readily, so it would be a lot of hassle to record each one. I realise there's no obligation to submit anything, but I want to make my trip worthwhile to the cause as well as it being a personal sight-seeing trip. The organisers have put in so much effort, why shouldn't I?
Thanks for any further input!