FA off makes a lot of things -easier- than having FA on.
True, if you are used to it. At the beginning is can be disorientating for someone new.
FA off makes a lot of things -easier- than having FA on.
I was comparing to Eite 1 not Frontier.
I've heard so many good ideas, many on this thread
1. Allowing in-system jumps in return for wear & tear/repair bills - you have to use supercruise if you're not willing to pay the price
2. Introducing in-system jump beacons, where you have to go/arrive when jumping - risky because you fall out of your jump (and potentially have to start it) at jump beacons in real space, so you trade the SC tedium for real-space, actual combat risk. Key thing is that if you have intel telling you there's likely to be a camp, you can avoid it by using SC, avoiding the usual EVE-style ganking.
3. Introducing some slightly more Newtonian mechanics which make it possible to arrive much quicker if you exploit the gravity wells. Even allow advance plotting of launch trajectories, using slingshotting etc.
4. Allow us to do more stuff while travelling.
For this last point, I have a slew of ideas, many of which, I'm sure, are not new:
-- Plotting and planning the above trajectories - even for other systems where we have the system data. Hell, orbital SC trajectories could even become saleable commodities like trade data, which you could farm for profit.
-- Allow us to buy actual trade reports, with prices, from nearby systems - maybe even from other pilots we see on our radar. Allow us to review these on our HUD while still piloting
-- Make the available modules for outfitting available for review similarly
-- Have a smaller, simpler (2D graph) in-HUD system/galaxy map allowing more interactive route planning while flying
-- Make stations broadcast mission adverts across the system when you get within radio range. Have them pop up on the HUD, and allow them to be selected to immediately target the relevant station
-- Improve the "call the police when I'm attacked functionality" so it's actually a broadcast across the system, which attracts NPC bounty hunters and can also be picked up and turned into something similar to a USS for anyone who has a suitable receiver module in their ship. Make the transmitter manually activated, with some cost (e.g. drains capacitors) but powerful enough to have a very high chance of attracting attention.
NONE of these remove Supercruise, or even fundamentally change it or damage the nature of it. They are all opt-out features which would just increase the number of things you can do and the potential skills you can learn to better take advantage of it. They would mostly introduce more meta and more interaction without taking away from the ability to avoid it entirely and focus on the solitude.
Frontier are obviously very happy with SC, as are many on here, so perhaps it would be a good idea to focus on these kinds of ideas which might have a chance of more widespread approval, rather than just having a polarised slanging match.
Some good ideas there.
But I wouldn't mind them simply making acceleration and deceleration a lot quicker.
I inwardly groan when I see a station over 1000LS away.
What would be "unscientific" about turbulence in hyperspace? I mean, we don't actually know what hyperspace would be like, even if it existed (which it probably doesn't).No, but making space "bumpy" (full of obstacles one has to pilot around) would be... aside the fact it would be even more unscientific then it already is.
It's NOT inevitable that SuperCruise has really slow acceleration/deceleration & really low top speeds. Frontier just designed it that way, for some reason. I imagine they thought it would allow us to feel the size & admire the beauty of space, but as it currently stands there is far far too much time to "admire" things.Autopilot or not distances in space are huge and behind imaginations...so it's inevitable that a lot of time is spent in traveling between systems.
Autopilot or not distances in space are huge and behind imaginations...so it's inevitable that a lot of time is spent in traveling between systems.
A part a jump gates system (which makes no sense here) I cant really imagine another way to Supercruise atm.
It's NOT inevitable that SuperCruise has really slow acceleration/deceleration & really low top speeds. Frontier just designed it that way, for some reason. I imagine they thought it would allow us to feel the size & admire the beauty of space, but as it currently stands there is far far too much time to "admire" things.
If I wanted to admire stuff, I can put the SC brakes on. If I wanted to get somewhere quick, I should be able to put SC into "overdrive", rather than it staying stuck in first gear.
Why cant you just select your star system and starport (if known, if not, then a nav beacon or whatever) and press 'Engage' and the drive just sends you there in autopilot? It pops out at the star, it turns the ship and points it at the port and accelerates faster and pops out at the port where you take manual control again? Why is that so hard? Why cant it go faster? Its fiction anyway for crying out loud, you can make a computer game do anything! Its not a simulator because the real thing doesnt exist so how can you simulate something you dont know? It's just an 'interpretation' of how the devs believe space travel would work based on current understanding of physics etc.
All those backers with cockpits and pedals and joysticks - its not a flight simulator really, whatever FDEV tell you- its science fiction! A simulator would be based on technology we have. I think you guys think like this:
.
'Simulator = game made difficult to play by the non initiated and require the use of sticks, pedals and loads of keys, anything that puts off casual gamers so that when our mates and wifes say we are kids and nerds playing computer games we can be superior and state that it isnt a game! Its a simulator! Look at all the kit I have bought! No gamers could play this, see how many controls there are! Don't put me in the same camp as teenagers and dipsticks that have Xboxs etc"
.
Well, you are in the same camp but you're just more boring and geekier. Anyway, sorry about the rant but you Backers (most not all) are very irritating and need to start seeing things from everyones perspective, we know what you think, we hear it enough.
.
So to summarise, there are plenty of reasons you could give to make anything plausible in this game to make the game more fun for everyone not just the 'enthusiasts'. Whats the bet if you added Autopilot, the Nerds would use it too?
Why cant you just select your star system and starport (if known, if not, then a nav beacon or whatever) and press 'Engage' and the drive just sends you there in autopilot? It pops out at the star, it turns the ship and points it at the port and accelerates faster and pops out at the port where you take manual control again? Why is that so hard? Why cant it go faster? Its fiction anyway for crying out loud, you can make a computer game do anything! Its not a simulator because the real thing doesnt exist so how can you simulate something you dont know? It's just an 'interpretation' of how the devs believe space travel would work based on current understanding of physics etc.
It's NOT inevitable that SuperCruise has really slow acceleration/deceleration & really low top speeds. Frontier just designed it that way, for some reason. I imagine they thought it would allow us to feel the size & admire the beauty of space, but as it currently stands there is far far too much time to "admire" things.
If I wanted to admire stuff, I can put the SC brakes on. If I wanted to get somewhere quick, I should be able to put SC into "overdrive", rather than it staying stuck in first gear.
Yes, I would imagine some kind of autopilot is not really going to cut it for you!Supercruise is pretty hands on when you have a price on your head, and are cruising a heavily policed system trying to intercept merchant shipping...![]()
So if I want to be a pirate or a bountyhunter I just get to camp a navpoint? Sounds a pretty boring game to me...
Yes, the biggest problem with SC for me is that it doesn't require any mental input at all. The end result being I get distracted and overshoot - often by further than I had when I set my initial vector. I think the realism ideal and the fanboi support will be the death of it. If I was genuinely on a 6 month trip to mars, I'd have a stack of steam downloads to fill a 4TB drive, and a schedule for drive, workout, photography, play, sleep. Not 15 minute cycles of think, wait. (interspersed with tea and overshoot).
Its not a question about racing to the end - if you think that is really what the complaints are, you are greatly lacking in the ability to read a post with anything other than your own preconception.
The time taken is not the problem. The problem is how to maintain a suitable level of mental engagement for the majority of the time. If I could check my trade or navigation plans whilst in the mid-section of a SC jump, it would help. For this to work, it would need prox alarms (destination and threat) and more sophisticated data management tools (in game or as extensions).