Does not fit. Inara shows influence changes between 2 factions there.
There are multiple sorts of BGS locks which can affect entire systems, certain BGS actions, or just single assets - in this case, the controlling asset might be locked to the winner of the Bridging the Gap Initiative, without any other locks.
Full BGS locks where no influence or state can move at all are incredibly rare (I think, at the moment, just the starter zone) but it doesn't need to be anywhere near that strong.
are you serious?
i'm pretty sure the application require you to chose a system that has at least a starport/station and no other pmf native to that system
It does
today - I just checked. What it did several months ago is a different question. And for that matter, given that the bug tracker hides compulsory fields and so breaks bug reports if you use certain browsers, and was written by the same company, I wouldn't entirely put it past Frontier that it shows
me the system selection fields but doesn't show them to other people.
Regardless of how it was selected, this system
should have been excluded from placement under several of the rules - lore-significant, "in the news", restricted systems. What we've seen repeatedly is that Frontier doesn't update its list of which systems are considered under that as more story happens, however, leading to various unsuitable placements.
(That said, Frontier also extremely rarely applies BGS rules retrospectively even if the original decision was wrong; I can think of exactly one case of a faction actually being moved for non-plot reasons)