Methinks AA has the itchy trigger finger on the "Close Thread" button here![]()
I might be wrong, but I don’t think he can if he’s contributed to it in a non-mod capacity.
T.j, on the other hand...
Methinks AA has the itchy trigger finger on the "Close Thread" button here![]()
whats the problem with player controlled stations/outpost?:O
I might be wrong, but I don’t think he can if he’s contributed to it in a non-mod capacity.
T.j, on the other hand...
Of course, it's players are diatoms in an ocean.
How I came here from Star Citizen?
A lot of valid points and things that have been brought up in the past before, but that doesn't make it any less relevant or valid as feedback goes.
These comments were limited but let's not go down the route of "another of these threads," "oh, another white knight defending FD," or "it's just a bunch of whinging" folks. It's not especially constructive and just derails things unnecessarily.
The volume of sand, or lack thereof as far as the feedback on this and the reddit thread goes, is something I see comments about a lot. There's not much I can comment on it just yet but I thought it prudent to drop in and at least acknowledge it. We see it a bunch, and while I'm not always in agreement, it's hard to really deny people's perceptions of it... both sides of the argument make a good case for their side. I can't say that this will be resolved completely because that's a bit of a stretch when a lot of it is also down to what people want at the individual level. That said I am hopeful that future updates in the Beyond updates and (for lack of a better word) beyond will go a long way to address many people's umbrage with ED.
I appreciate that 2.4 wasn't well received (which the reddit thread was talking about.) We said from the very beginning that it was a different way of doing things. Criticism is an opportunity to learn, so this is what we will continue to do. Feedback is gathered regularly so as we move forward we will keep a note of what aspects worked and which parts received the harshest reception to help inform future content releases. We're immensely proud of what we've done but humble enough to learn and do better every time.
whats the problem with player controlled stations/outpost?:O
Where's the fun in that?Did you go through the funny looking portal? What’s the first rule about the funny looking portal? Don’t go through it.
Now you've really hyped me into downloading NMS again
A lot of valid points and things that have been brought up in the past before, but that doesn't make it any less relevant or valid as feedback goes.
These comments were limited but let's not go down the route of "another of these threads," "oh, another white knight defending FD," or "it's just a bunch of whinging" folks. It's not especially constructive and just derails things unnecessarily.
The volume of sand, or lack thereof as far as the feedback on this and the reddit thread goes, is something I see comments about a lot. There's not much I can comment on it just yet but I thought it prudent to drop in and at least acknowledge it. We see it a bunch, and while I'm not always in agreement, it's hard to really deny people's perceptions of it... both sides of the argument make a good case for their side. I can't say that this will be resolved completely because that's a bit of a stretch when a lot of it is also down to what people want at the individual level. That said I am hopeful that future updates in the Beyond updates and (for lack of a better word) beyond will go a long way to address many people's umbrage with ED.
I appreciate that 2.4 wasn't well received (which the reddit thread was talking about.) We said from the very beginning that it was a different way of doing things. Criticism is an opportunity to learn, so this is what we will continue to do. Feedback is gathered regularly so as we move forward we will keep a note of what aspects worked and which parts received the harshest reception to help inform future content releases. We're immensely proud of what we've done but humble enough to learn and do better every time.
Where's the fun in that?
Rules are made to be broken.
Thank you, but it still doesn’t answer one of the most pressing issues: is it, or is it not, T.j’s fault?
Where's the fun in that?
Rules are made to be broken.
A lot of valid points and things that have been brought up in the past before, but that doesn't make it any less relevant or valid as feedback goes.
These comments were limited but let's not go down the route of "another of these threads," "oh, another white knight defending FD," or "it's just a bunch of whinging" folks. It's not especially constructive and just derails things unnecessarily.
The volume of sand, or lack thereof as far as the feedback on this and the reddit thread goes, is something I see comments about a lot. There's not much I can comment on it just yet but I thought it prudent to drop in and at least acknowledge it. We see it a bunch, and while I'm not always in agreement, it's hard to really deny people's perceptions of it... both sides of the argument make a good case for their side. I can't say that this will be resolved completely because that's a bit of a stretch when a lot of it is also down to what people want at the individual level. That said I am hopeful that future updates in the Beyond updates and (for lack of a better word) beyond will go a long way to address many people's umbrage with ED.
I appreciate that 2.4 wasn't well received (which the reddit thread was talking about.) We said from the very beginning that it was a different way of doing things. Criticism is an opportunity to learn, so this is what we will continue to do. Feedback is gathered regularly so as we move forward we will keep a note of what aspects worked and which parts received the harshest reception to help inform future content releases. We're immensely proud of what we've done but humble enough to learn and do better every time.
[video=youtube;rYEDA3JcQqw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYEDA3JcQqw[/video]They said that about plates and look where that got us.
Methinks AA has the itchy trigger finger on the "Close Thread" button here![]()
Pretty good response to that awesome feedback as well. Glad to hear Dale could lessen your umbrage to some extend.That alone was one of the MOST AWESOME FEEDBACKS I've seen from any company employee / community manager ever.
Thank you so much for existing, Dale.
Blessed you be.
This is a popular opinion about the game though. ED has maybe the largest virtual sandbox of any game, but there's too little sand that we can mold, change and influence by ourselves.
Player owned capital ships like the Fleet Carrier and in-game guild support will be major improvements. The game needs more player controlled content.
Pretty good response to that awesome feedback as well. Glad to hear Dale could lessen your umbrage to some extend.
Did I do that right?