Fall DLC 2023 Speculation

The meta-wishlist is a drop in the ocean. This community extends well beyond the few people who participated in it.
It is always the same comment. But the Meta Wishlist is the only thing I can find which has a counted number of votes by a higher number of users. Thats why I take it as a reference. Seeing 10 people on Reddit Posting they want some animal within the Game shows that 10 people want that animal but it has no comparing value.
That is somehow also the same here within the Forum. Louder peoples animal wishes within the Forum seem to be much more popular than they really are. Best example is the Tanuki which often is and was mentioned as requested animal but only Ranks somewhere around place 60 in the meantime (and this was a Forum example).
 
Bat, armadillo, sloth.

Caracal and Striped hyena were also popular.
Right, forgot about the exhibit animals. Caracal I guess was fairly popular. Armadillo and Hyena....well, I would not consider them hugely requested, but rather the "nice to have" category? I guess these are arguable.

But this only adds to my point. I am not saying that support wont end at the end of this year, but I do not agree that we are suddenly recieving popular animals and that it is an indicator that they are wrapping things up, because we have always been recieving about the same amount of popular animals and I do not see any change now in this regards personally.
 
Last edited:
Right, forgot about the exhibit animals. Caracal I guess was fairly popular. Armadillo and Hyena....well, I would not consider them hugely requested, but rather the "nice to have" category?

But this only adds to my point. I am not saying that support wont end at the end of this year, but I do not agree that we are suddenly recieving popular animals and that it is an indicator that they are wrapping things up, because we have always been recieving about the same amount of popular animals and I do not see any change now in this regards personally.
An Armadillo species was highly requested but their votes were very divided because of all the different Armadillo species. So the list did not really reflected this as all different species have an own ranking. But taking all votes together it would have been a Top 15 animal.
 
That's because there was literally no more ideas while there are plenty remaining for PZ for 2024.

Yes, until the game is formally announced they need to continue to engage with fanbase and keep them committed. Games take years to develop and are announced in the final year. If Frontier ends DLCs 4 years before PZ2 release, the fanbase will dissipate and a rival game studio might try to take the market.
There would have still be plenty of ideas for PC, i just say waterparks with all its rides and extensions, more movie collabs and so on.

And sorry to dissapoint you but thats very, very unlikely to happen, they will in no way continue releasing DLCs for this game until PZ2 is announced. At one point they will simply stop and we have to wait. And tbh i dont really think they care if a rival studio makes a zoo game. They still own the Planet Zoo name and their hardcore fans will still play it even if development stops and as soon as they announce the new one, with all its new ideas and possibilities, they will attract huge numbers of players again. Its not like they would have to fear any competition at this point.
 
Again, nobody is claiming to have more knowledge about the endgame than anyone else. I'm starting to think that this contrarianism around the game ending is an emotional reaction, not a logical examination. Let's look at the facts once again:
  • Highly requested species are being released far more frequently than ever before.
  • We haven't had a major feature update in a while, the new update features are comparatively minor and simplistic.
  • There is potentially a new Planet game on the horizon, and as we know Planet Coaster wound down when Planet Zoo was coming up.
  • Not to mention, AFAIK the sales figure of Planet Zoo are shrinking.
Nobody wants the game to end, but let's be real here, it's going to happen some day, and signs are pointing to "some day soon". If (big if IMO) we get another year of support for 2024 (FY2025) then I'd hands-down expect that to be the last.
Exactly that, the writing is on the wall for some time now and people just refuse to see it, out of fear of loosing the chance for their favourite animals to appear in the game. But to be real, there will never be a point where everyones fav animal will be in the game and we should accept that and enjoy the roster we have now + whatever comes in the next two packs.
 
I had this "Frontier is collaborating with XY zoo to add flying birds!" in my PM box shortly before the aquatic pack came out. The autho of that message later became a troll who keeps making fake account on the forum, on YouTube etc. to harrass others and keep posting stuff exactly like that stuff posted on ZooChat.
Now, I know some bird fans don't want to give up hope and don't watnt to believe me, so keep your hope for a bird pack all you want, but regarding this information, ask yourself one question:
Why would an UK based company collaborate with a bird zoo that far away, in a very different time zone, with no way to fly their staff in or do so at very expensive costs, when they can collaborate with zoos much closer, be it a pure bird park or not? And why WOULD Frontier even need a pure bird park? I bet Chester Zoo, with whom they usually collaborate, has birds, right?
Collaborating with Singapore wouldn't be practical, logical or cost effective.

Just adding that collaborating with a zoo doesn't mean having to physically go to the zoo. Frontier did some collabs with San Diego Zoo in the earliest months after the launch, before the covid. It makes sense designing the game visiting the zoos they have near them, but then using the best zoos in the word to make the promos (Chester, San Diego... and maybe now Singapore).
Source: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TYZq-kPKQcA

FY2024 goes until 31st May 2024. Only the full report in mid September will hopefully make things clear for us!

Hopefully, but I won't be able to bear a whole summer of doom-posting around these forums.

Again, nobody is claiming to have more knowledge about the endgame than anyone else. I'm starting to think that this contrarianism around the game ending is an emotional reaction, not a logical examination. Let's look at the facts once again:
  • Highly requested species are being released far more frequently than ever before.
  • We haven't had a major feature update in a while, the new update features are comparatively minor and simplistic.
  • There is potentially a new Planet game on the horizon, and as we know Planet Coaster wound down when Planet Zoo was coming up.
  • Not to mention, AFAIK the sales figure of Planet Zoo are shrinking.
Nobody wants the game to end, but let's be real here, it's going to happen some day, and signs are pointing to "some day soon". If (big if IMO) we get another year of support for 2024 (FY2025) then I'd hands-down expect that to be the last.

On the contrary, I think our first DLCs were full of even more highly requested species. Not even things like "A lot of people like porcupines, give us porcupines", but more like "this game has no Australian or South American animals". Polar bear, kangaroo, koala, jaguar, llama, capuchin monkey... Any of those is more essential to a zoo game than any of the animals in the last 2-3 DLCs except maybe the dromedary (just "maybe" because we already got some camel in base game).

Shrinking figures are absolutely expected on any project of this kind. It happens from video games sales to movies box office. The important thing is the rate of shrinking, and the famous graphic proves that PZ is the game by Frontier that is behaving the best on the long term.

I'm letting here my post from just one month ago where I bet on having our last DLC on summer 2024 or even on summer 2025.

About the classical "this is last year" topic... I know Planet Coaster and Planet Zoo are different market products (this has been discussed in previous threads) but I also think we can learn some things comparing them. PC was announced in early 2015 and released in Nov 2016, got all its DLCs between autumn 2017 and summer 2019, and it was re-released in consoles and Mac in Nov 2020. Also, in Nov 2018 Frontier released the thememaker's toolkit. On the other side, PZ was announced in Apr 2019 and released in Nov 2019 so a bit in between where PC would have had its autumn and winter 2019 DLCs.
If we add the well known graphic from the last financial report we see that Frontier released DLCs for PC during 2 years even though there weren't very significant cash bumps, so they stopped when either they run out of ideas for new features or rides, or they were sure the cash flow wasn't going to be profitable enough. The development of PZ probably had some influence but still PC got DLCs in the meantime and even its last DLC was after PZ had been announced. In this last report Frontier also told:
"Our first real-time strategy game, using Warhammer Age of Sigmar IP licensed from Games Workshop will launch in FY24. We are already in development for a new title for FY25, as well as early-stage scoping for another new game in FY26".
View attachment 356127
So my quick conclusions (from myself who know nothing about business economics or videogames design):
  • Planet Coaster 2 or any other new Planet game would be released in the month of November. It's a bit too late for having an announcement for a release in Nov 2023, also Frontier only releases 1 game per year and FY24 is for the upcoming Warhammer game, so I think the release will be in Nov 2024 or maybe even Nov 2025 (FY26 means from summer 2025 to spring 2026 IIRC). It depends on which of those new games for FY25 and FY26 will be PC2 and which one will be some very different thing like F1 Manager, Elite Dangerous... I wouldn't expect a PZ2 or any other animal sim so early (see how well was having two Jurassic World sims in 3 years).
  • Planet Zoo is having a very good cash performance, driven by a regular release of DLCs and free updates. It's the game that shows the best Frontier's model of "develop, launch and nurture", not only a profitable game, and it could be considered their flagship. Even in its 4th year PZ is having right now more profits than PC had in its first year, and way more than PC when they decided to stop releasing DLCs. Let's hope they keep going with the nurturing.
  • Planet Coaster's thememaker's toolkit was released 1 year before Planet Zoo, so starting PC's last year of DLCs. We still don't have a thememaker's toolkit for PZ, and maybe we will never have it, but it would be something very useful for sure. If a toolkit is released, we can prepare ourselves for the last year of support, but for now we can't be sure.
  • Planet Zoo was developed during the "nurture" phase of Planet Coaster, but PC's DLCs stopped right when PZ was going to be released (5 months before). Therefore, if PC2 is released in Nov 2024, the last DLC for PZ will be in summer 2024, so we still have 5 more. Hopefully PC2 will be released in Nov 2025 and our last DLC will be in summer 2025. That's what I think it would be better for both them and us.
 
Last edited:
Just adding that collaborating with a zoo doesn't mean having to physically go to the zoo. Frontier did some collabs with San Diego Zoo in the earliest months after the launch, before the covid. It makes sense designing the game visiting the zoos they have near them, but then using the best zoos in the word to make the promos (Chester, San Diego... and maybe now Singapore).
Source: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TYZq-kPKQcA
DeLady already reminded me of that on Twitter, but remember, they actually did send staff over and it was for the MAIN game, so at the beginning of the life cycle of the game, when a huge profit was expected. Not for a random DLC nearing the end of the life cycle. No matter how much anyone believes PZ will go on for much longer, it doesn't make as much profit as it did 2019.
It's on everybody alone what to believe or not believe, I'll still stay with the opinion that the singapore thing alone already is proof enough that it's a totally fake rumor.
 
Wow you guys really doing some mental gymnastics to justify your assumption of the game ending support lol, the arid pack literally released a week ago like come on now how are you even saying it's performing worse when we can't even do a proper assessement of that 😭😭😭😭 And I think there is no need to explain that older trailers are inherently going to have more views than recent ones. .-.
Nobody wants the game to end, but let's be real here, it's going to happen some day, and signs are pointing to "some day soon". If (big if IMO) we get another year of support for 2024 (FY2025) then I'd hands-down expect that to be the last.
What the... NONE of those signs are right nor point out support is ending anytime soon, why are you guys being like this omg 😭😭😭
  • They have been adding highly requested animals in the packs since the first DLC (how is this even a reason, obviously they are not going to add stuff that is not going to sell wth), arguably the last DLCs are being WORSE in that aspect because they are adding random not-so-requested species (Asiant water monitor, dama gazelle, sand cat, hello?)
  • Again, the reason updates aren't major anymore is simply because the window for adding substantial changes to the game reduces every time it gets updated
  • Them working on a game means nothing, they are working on their next Planet game as we speak, they work on several games at the same time that's what a game developing company does 😭😭😭
  • Planet Zoo is currently in the top 50 sellers on steam right now 😭😭😭 the sales are far from being shrinking, the game keeps selling consistently, where do you even get this from??

And most importantly of all, the Planet Zoo playerbase is still highly active, specially compared to JWE2, which is a bigger seller simply because it's multiplatform. Just check steamdb, there is no noticeable decline at all, the Tropical pack had the highest peak in players since the Wetlands pack, where is the decline here? Just by checking the numbers, when the Conservation pack released last year the player count was 8835, with the release of Arid pack the count is seemingly 8641, if you told me the player count has reduced more than half I would be worrying, but it's not the case.

Also how is that report summary any indication of PZ being bad, it just mentions their biggest seller and last year releases? Why would they have to mention Planet Zoo??? And then you have the audacity to say you are not being doomers...
 
Wow you guys really doing some mental gymnastics to justify your assumption of the game ending support lol, the arid pack literally released a week ago like come on now how are you even saying it's performing worse when we can't even do a proper assessement of that 😭😭😭😭 And I think there is no need to explain that older trailers are inherently going to have more views than recent ones. .-.

What the... NONE of those signs are right nor point out support is ending anytime soon, why are you guys being like this omg 😭😭😭
  • They have been adding highly requested animals in the packs since the first DLC (how is this even a reason, obviously they are not going to add stuff that is not going to sell wth), arguably the last DLCs are being WORSE in that aspect because they are adding random not-so-requested species (Asiant water monitor, dama gazelle, sand cat, hello?)
  • Again, the reason updates aren't major anymore is simply because the window for adding substantial changes to the game reduces every time it gets updated
  • Them working on a game means nothing, they are working on their next Planet game as we speak, they work on several games at the same time that's what a game developing company does 😭😭😭
  • Planet Zoo is currently in the top 50 sellers on steam right now 😭😭😭 the sales are far from being shrinking, the game keeps selling consistently, where do you even get this from??

And most importantly of all, the Planet Zoo playerbase is still highly active, specially compared to JWE2, which is a bigger seller simply because it's multiplatform. Just check steamdb, there is no noticeable decline at all, the Tropical pack had the highest peak in players since the Wetlands pack, where is the decline here? Just by checking the numbers, when the Conservation pack released last year the player count was 8835, with the release of Arid pack the count is seemingly 8641, if you told me the player count has reduced more than half I would be worrying, but it's not the case.

Also how is that report summary any indication of PZ being bad, it just mentions their biggest seller and last year releases? Why would they have to mention Planet Zoo??? And then you have the audacity to say you are not being doomers...
Then Iben is also a doomer by now. Again I have no idea why you guys refuse to even think about the possibility that we go towards the end of the game. No dooming here whatsoever, just looking at what we have atm and making conclusions from that, the same way you do, just in a different direction. And to be real, NO ONE here, can say with 100% guarantee if the games gets more support or not. No one here works for them, no one here has any insight. The game could end tomorrow, if the higher ups at Frontier decide it so, and we would need to accept that. Or it could go on for another year.

But as it stands by now, this could be the last year in the same way as we could get another year. The chances are 50/50, if we ignore sales, declining playerbase, popularity on steam or any positive and negative factors, which tbh there is no factor that says definitely more support and no factor that says otherwhise.
We can only know for sure once the annual report releases in september. Until then its no doom-saying, its just us accepting the fact that we could see the end soon and that we are fine with that
 
Wow you guys really doing some mental gymnastics to justify your assumption of the game ending support lol, the arid pack literally released a week ago like come on now how are you even saying it's performing worse when we can't even do a proper assessement of that 😭😭😭😭 And I think there is no need to explain that older trailers are inherently going to have more views than recent ones. .-.

What the... NONE of those signs are right nor point out support is ending anytime soon, why are you guys being like this omg 😭😭😭
  • They have been adding highly requested animals in the packs since the first DLC (how is this even a reason, obviously they are not going to add stuff that is not going to sell wth), arguably the last DLCs are being WORSE in that aspect because they are adding random not-so-requested species (Asiant water monitor, dama gazelle, sand cat, hello?)
  • Again, the reason updates aren't major anymore is simply because the window for adding substantial changes to the game reduces every time it gets updated
  • Them working on a game means nothing, they are working on their next Planet game as we speak, they work on several games at the same time that's what a game developing company does 😭😭😭
  • Planet Zoo is currently in the top 50 sellers on steam right now 😭😭😭 the sales are far from being shrinking, the game keeps selling consistently, where do you even get this from??

And most importantly of all, the Planet Zoo playerbase is still highly active, specially compared to JWE2, which is a bigger seller simply because it's multiplatform. Just check steamdb, there is no noticeable decline at all, the Tropical pack had the highest peak in players since the Wetlands pack, where is the decline here? Just by checking the numbers, when the Conservation pack released last year the player count was 8835, with the release of Arid pack the count is seemingly 8641, if you told me the player count has reduced more than half I would be worrying, but it's not the case.

Also how is that report summary any indication of PZ being bad, it just mentions their biggest seller and last year releases? Why would they have to mention Planet Zoo??? And then you have the audacity to say you are not being doomers...
Also the "audacity to say you are not being doomers"?! Im sorry mate, but its a name, you guys, who refuse to accept something to end, give people, who try to see it more realistically. Please dont try to force a term on someone and then say they they would be audacious to not accept it. Thats really not a great beheaviour for someone in a community, that otherwhise is very welcoming and friendly to each other.
 
Maybe some people need to understand that saying "PZ isn't as profitable as it was 2019" = saying "PZ is a total financial disappointment to Frontier". (does not equal that sign means, editoopr is not crossing it out correctly) But balance has to be kept between production cost and revenue.
And it's totally naive to think that the game isn't understaffed and they could work on two Planet games to a huge scale (so more than mini-DLCs) simulatnously without hiring more people. And hiring more people means more costs. That need to flow back with revenue. A scale of revenue PZ might (or in my opionion definately does not) bring anymore.
Whether we get another full year of support or not, believing we are not nearer the end of support than we were a year ago or even 2019 is ... delusional.

And the free updates sure as h. aren't getting smaller because there is not enough room for new things....
 
Whether we get another full year of support or not, believing we are not nearer the end of support than we were a year ago or even 2019 is ... delusional.
Nobody here said that though? Obviously as time progresses we get nearer to the end of support, nobody is disagreeing with that, but that doesn't mean it's gonna be soon when the game is still performing well and has a highly active playerbase that guarantees the profitability of more DLCs...

I think the disagreement here is that some people think support is ending this year (the same way people doubted on support for 2023), while others (myself included) believe support for 2024 is almost guaranteed considering the current status of the game.
 
I'm not gonna engage in much of this discussion (I kinda missed most of it and I can't be bothered to read it all to be entirely honest), but here's my two cents anyway. I would not be at all surprised if support ends this year, even if it means that we don't receive certain popular animals by the end of support (gotta keep some stuff for PZ2 I suppose). HOWEVER, I do believe that there is enough going for at least some if not entire support for 2024, but it's obviously not a guarantee. Even if a new Planet series game gets announced next year, there could still be one or two packs like how Planet Coaster had it's last two the same year that we got Planet Zoo.

I say we just try to enjoy whatever comes next my dudes, dudettes, and gender dudetrals.
 
Appears to hold its own. Looking up some other games on the link oca2074 provided....

The Sims 3 1.4m sold revenue $17.9m
Jurassic World Evolution 1.5m sold revenue $50.6m
Two Point Hospital 974k sold revenue $22m
Tropico 6 850k sold revenue $29.2m
Planet Coaster 2.7m sold revenue 82.1m (considering PC is 3 years older than PZ)

True, some games - Cities Skylines and Stardew Valley were 2 I looked up - knock PZ out of the park, but in fairness they released 4 and 3 years earlier than Plan Zoo, respectively.
What's amazing is PZ is solely for PC, no console not even Mac. So think about how many of those games were PC only.
 
Back
Top Bottom