I've been rambling almost constantly that the majority of workforce is on the new paid DLC, and a skeleton crew who drew the shortest straw is in charge of the live game right now. I can only hope that the Delayed Era includes much needed rewrites which will then hopefully trickle down (who am I kidding).
@KolramiRegressionTests welcome to the forum Username checks out with the post ;-) IDK how long you are in game, but if your forum age is of any indication, I think you will be terrified of the level of QA in Elite ;-))) And not in a good way
Well I have been playing about a year now, but today I had to post on the official forum, such were my feelings about this calamitous own goal by Frontier.
As for resourcing decisions within Frontier, diverting the more experienced resources to paid DLC has some logic behind it - but those hockey stick profit graphs they are looking to generate with Delayed Era are going to be undermined by punching the existing user-base in the balls. And to be honest, it is still not an excuse because clearly the experienced staff are not even brought in to smoke test patches, or even review code. Four failed attempts to fix mining means clearly there are coding errors and design hacks taking place, and none of this should get out the door if you call yourself a serious games company. Therefore right now, Frontier are not a serious games company, and word is getting around.
A bad reputation DOES reduce sales. Look at what happened to EA. On principle people think twice before giving them money, because often what they do with it seems inexcusable. If Frontier simply ignore what is just cause and effect, they will fail. The games industry is too competitive to allow neglectful principles to be sustainable for any company.