FORUM METAGAMING IN PROGRESS

There are a couple of threads talking about PP potentially going open-only. One on here where there is debate happening, one on the focused feedback forum were there should not be debate, only direct feedback to the devs.

That other feedback thread is being flooded with "yes, open only for PP" comments by new forum accounts.

This is a pattern anyone who's played EVE will have seen before. We are being metagamed.

It is obvious that groups who do not normally participate here are whistling up their members to join and post approving comments on the feedback thread.

Dave:

I play in solo. But, I am also now beginning to play two EVE accounts, free to play, because I am losing interest in Elite.

Those who wish to play EVE will do so. Those who wish to play Elite in an EVE-like fashion will be disappointed, in my opinion. Those who wish to play Elite in solo, will also be disappointed, as attention is given to multi-player development.
 
Well... The way groups are able to attack without ever being even visible is the reason we gave up pp. The change would make the system fair.

They aint invisible to their opponents in the "no trolls" group, and they get engaged with regularity by 'em. They are playing PP exactly how you want it, with the risk of PvP. They just only choose to play with people who have been vouched for as not being jerks. That doesn't make them allies, I promise you :)
 
Dave:

I don't think this thread is being very productive. If you think bandwagons and AstroTurf are being used, to support a change you feel is wrong, report it. Please do not lash out at others with different opinions.
 
Dave:

I play in solo. But, I am also now beginning to play two EVE accounts, free to play, because I am losing interest in Elite.

Those who wish to play EVE will do so. Those who wish to play Elite in an EVE-like fashion will be disappointed, in my opinion. Those who wish to play Elite in solo, will also be disappointed, as attention is given to multi-player development.

I'm sure you're right. However, "Those who wish to play Elite in solo, will also be disappointed, as attention is given to multi-player development." is, to my mind, part of the problem. Multiplayer != open. Multiplayer can be PGs, whether they have a code of conduct that goes beyond what is enforced in open or not. Multiplayer only content - such as multicrew or wings - is not open only. All are playing in the same galaxy by the same rules. All deal with folks in other groups or in other instances working against them and their game is not diminished thereby, for all the yelling and screaming some folks do on here. And this was a fundamental promise of ED from the get-go, the reason why more of the folks who wanted to play solo DIDN'T seek refunds when offline mode was axed, the ED equivalent of setting up "my server/game/map-instance, my rules" in other multiplayer games. FD should not break this.
 

verminstar

Banned
I was gonna write a big rant...but this kush is just too good and I completely forgot what the point was halfway through a third of the way there. Actually forgot what era I was in fer a bit there and first thing I thought was, wheres the poll and what fun options do we have to choose from.

I had a metagame once but she was terrible at roleplay...
 
This post is one of the most immature attempts to torpedo a discussion I have ever seen.
Go to the official post that was set up by Sandro the lead designer himself.
Are you accusing him of meta gaming or just those that don't share your opinion?
 
Last edited:
Astroturfing is still astroturfing.

ETA: And awareness that it is happening is a good thing, If only one side of a debate mobilizes to submit their feedback with the other folks not being aware that mobilization is taking place, even a minority can appear to overwhelmingly prevail.

And what makes you think anyone is telling people to post in support of open as opposed to simply making their members aware of the situation, causing those members to then go and post their opinion? I'm in a multitude of powerplay groups, and every single one has posted something along the lines of "look at these potential changes and give your feedback on them" as opposed to any "say yes to open only" sort of thing.

I was gonna write a big rant...but this kush is just too good and I completely forgot what the point was halfway through a third of the way there. Actually forgot what era I was in fer a bit there and first thing I thought was, wheres the poll and what fun options do we have to choose from.

I had a metagame once but she was terrible at roleplay...

I miss being able to vote bacon on every poll.
 

verminstar

Banned
Can anyone vouch for this OP? I don't think I've seen him round here before?

Anyone?

That made me look at my reflection to check I still remembered who I was...but the longer I admire meself, the more aroused Im getting...Im quite a good looking fella actually when the light is low...
 
What a silly card to play.

I know that many, many open-enthusiasts, myself included, who don't use the forums often (for obvious reasons) have logged onto their accounts to express their positive opinions on the matter, because there is no focused feedback thread on reddit or other platforms and want our opinions to be heard.

Because the open community has flooded in to drown out the few who reside here and dictate everything to FDEV (2.1 NPCs, timed ship transfer etc) as we want this game to promote playing together you think this is a metagame? lol
 
What a silly card to play.

I know that many, many open-enthusiasts, myself included, who don't use the forums often (for obvious reasons) have logged onto their accounts to express their positive opinions on the matter, because there is no focused feedback thread on reddit or other platforms and want our opinions to be heard.

Because the open community has flooded in to drown out the few who reside here and dictate everything to FDEV (2.1 NPCs, timed ship transfer etc) as we want this game to promote playing together you think this is a metagame? lol

Everyone got a vote with ship transfer, perhaps a vote on open only PP is in order?
 
Sandro clearly asks for opinions and input on the topic.
I think he does NOT mean, give me your vote yes/no and we will do whatever is the majority.

So I don't see a problem. FDEV has the idea and they seem to have the will to decide freely and taking all issues and directions into account. Good move. The will ignore the just "yeah" sayers (and "nah" sayers).
 
Whats dis? '^'

are you insinuating something? :p

1376762526
hqdefault.jpg
 
Couldn't they make PP a threshold variable whereby a player was invited by factions to participate according to affiliation or some such and obliged to maintain an active role?
That way players such as myself, who don't have Xbox gold, could still participate if they wanted to.

Do away with the lifetime modules.

I understand how those who are dedicated to PP must feel about the abuse.
 

Deleted member 110222

D
New forum accounts does not mean new members — I took a look at the join date of a portion of people in the official thread (page 32 post #466, to page 36 post #539)

These are the join dates of the harmless and mostly harmless members on those pages. I excluded the names.

12/08/2016
26/12/2017
15/05/2018
15/05/2018
03/04/2015
16/10/2015
04/07/2017
09/11/2017
22/09/2015
29/12/2015
08/03/2018
01/12/2015
27/01/2018
17/08/2016
15/05/2018
24/01/2018

Take it from me guys, this dude here has a point. Low forum rank does not mean new.

Most of these Harmless posts are the norm'.

I'M THE WEIRD ONE! I've made over 16k posts since I joined in 2015... Which means only 7 seven people have more posts than me. :p

New flash - PP groups don't want those players. Threatening to de-pledge before you get your module shopping done is not a problem.

I'd go as far to say it's a boon.
 
Back
Top Bottom