I say there is room for Open, Open PvE, Solo, and PG. I have not found the arguments against it seem to boil down to we don't want it and you are a pathetic person for wanting it. If you can't quantify harm to your game outside of "we will have fewer victims, or fewer recruits for PvP", "it will change the flavor of the game", "but the BGS", or "resort to derision and name calling", you are not likely to convince anyone. If you are not harmed or can't even honestly explain how you are harmed, by an Open PvE mode, why is it an issue?s One side:
We want a mode to play with each other in our lacy panties well away from you filthy, ganking, PvP, griefers, since we are not interested in your stupid PvP, or being someone elses' victim, and the Moibius(es) are just not good enough for us as they are fragmented and virtually empty due to lack of PG management tools and PG size limits.
Other side:
You should just sack up, git gud, and play with us, or play by yourself in solo or some fragmented broken empty PG, and you are a pathetic, loser, care bear for even wanting to play a way different from the one we feel you should. You don't understand what the game even is bruh. It's Elite DANGEROUS man, not My Elite Little Pony bruh. /s
"It's already been stated." Is the answer I expect. The things already stated all being, or being based on, the unconvincing arguments I already dismissed above.
One side is asking for a new mode that greatly benefits them, and does not effect the other side all that much differently than the other modes already present in the game. The other is against it out of something they can't quite explain in a way that does not come off as disingenuous, as a poor excuse.
That said. I cannot imagine the poor luck of getting ganked every time you leave a station. It strains possibility even if the OP made Deciat their home.
Last edited: