Hi marx, keep in mind the last time the OP posted to this thread was nearly a year ago on 15th August 2022, and the last post was posted 1 day after that, 16th August 2022, so don't expect any sort of meaningful reply.
I found NEW traces of Thargoids on other side of the center!
- Thread starter Sethioz
- Start date
Hi marx, keep in mind the last time the OP posted to this thread was nearly a year ago on 15th August 2022, and the last post was posted 1 day after that, 16th August 2022, so don't expect any sort of meaningful reply.
Maybe you missed Frankymoles' reply just before the on of Marx ? He was the "Necromancer" in this case... 
Maybe you missed Frankymoles' reply just before the on of Marx ? He was the "Necromancer" in this case...
We on the same thread, because to me it looks like this;
Kotoku on August 16th 2022 followed by marx Today at 8.44pm
I suppose I could have Frankymoles post blocked, but if so, well it's an honest error.
That seems to be the case. Your screenshot also shows that post #18 is followed by post #20 on your end.
Thargoid remains aren't necesarily found on worlds with atmosphere with ammonia content. They are found in systems that have a gas giant with ammonia based life. I highly suspect if you look at your system map you will see one.
Edit: If you found thargoid remains far from the bubble in a system with no ammonia gas giant that might be a rare find.
Last edited:
No, there isn't one. Only the black hole, brown dwarfs and the rocky/icy bodies.
No, I don't need anyone to "verify" my find. I'm just saying what's there. I'll be flying out of the system later.
Well, if it's Sluemaei VO-A f29, which fits your description and coordinates, then there's a Gas Giant with Ammonia-based Life in there, AB 6 a.
Yes, I think I cocked up my system scans. Curses! Sorry about that.
So do these things go all the way to Beagle Point? Seems a bit strange. Did Thargoids explore the entire galaxy before we got there?
Maybe! It's similar behavior to us before Odyssey actually! We flew around and focused on systems with water or earthlike worlds, then launched our dss probes onto them and sometimes some of the other planets or moons.
Last edited:
It would seem they sent out probes.
Humanity did too, we used to find crashed probes on the surface in Horizons - are they still around in EDO? (I have never seen the scanner signal for one in hours of SRV driving in EDO.)
They fixed the human ones, I'm not finding any in totally undiscovered systems far out from civilisation.
Galatic 'geology' note ... considering that the thargs are meant to be MILLIONS? of years old?
it should come as no surprise, that inner rather than outer, and outer rather than inner... regions in the Galaxy, will have ROTATED further around, relative to outer realms, so perhaps in previous times, the other side could've been right next door!
I imagine exact-positions, would depend on a LOT of things. SS even migrate at different speeds, apparently.
The whole concept of a STATIC Galaxy, is a total myth.
it should come as no surprise, that inner rather than outer, and outer rather than inner... regions in the Galaxy, will have ROTATED further around, relative to outer realms, so perhaps in previous times, the other side could've been right next door!
I imagine exact-positions, would depend on a LOT of things. SS even migrate at different speeds, apparently.
The whole concept of a STATIC Galaxy, is a total myth.
"...arbitrarily stop at some point..." not disagreeing with you on most of your points, and not disagreeing with you on this one either,
but wasn't there a PLOT reason for that?
i.e. after FSDs came about, the previous generations of drives and corresponding slow expeditions stopped,
when previously, RATES of expansion, were relatively similar?
i.e. FSDs made for such a massive multiplier in time, with a little determination, that ANYwhere in galaxy we can reach, someone can get there in a few weeks or so,
whereas in the history of the BGS/plot... you're talking MONTHS, to get to nearby systems to SOL ... years,.. to get anywhere distant?
and relatively-synchronous departures and arrivals?
i.e. if the federation and empire were competing to get somewhere... and one left 2 years before the other, but the other had engines which were only a little better, and both's trip was expected to take 35 years... the 2nd one might make it 5 years earlier, but even that, would still be near equiDISTANT?
i.e. races everywhere, but the DISTANCES, are the same?
FSDs've blown all of that out of the water / left all that behind.
So i'm guessing, the 'edge' is meant to be where the slow-crawl stopped, and a totally new WAVE of speeds of investment, colonisation, etc,
SUPPLANTED it, leaving a sort of 'dead-wake' concept behind?
Last edited:
I don't think the Thargoids have been a spacefaring race for 120-odd million years (the time it would take for something on the far side of the galaxy to rotate around near us)? If so, it's remarkable how un-advanced they are; and how they've suddenly gained advances in the last ten years.
That is an incorrect assumption about the galaxy's rotation. The derived "rotation curve" for the Milky Way can be shown as:
Even Wikipedia can help:
Galaxy rotation curve - Wikipedia
I'd like to refer you to an easy-to understand series of STEM video books by David Butler, maybe start with:
EDITED FOR TYPO - sorry
Last edited:
That is an incorrect assumption about the galaxy's rotation. The derived "rotation curve" for the Milky Way can be shown as:
View attachment 359542
Even Wikipedia can help:
Galaxy rotation curve - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I's like to refer you to an easy-to understand series of STEM video books by Dr David Butler, maybe start with:
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eMNRa-KEiQ
Yeah, the rotation differential is flattened by the dark matter halo surrounding the galaxy, it's one of the big things in astronomy.
NASA
I don't think the Thargoids have been around long enough anyway...
That is an incorrect assumption about the galaxy's rotation. The derived "rotation curve" for the Milky Way can be shown as:
View attachment 359542
Even Wikipedia can help:
Galaxy rotation curve - Wikipedia
I'd like to refer you to an easy-to understand series of STEM video books by David Butler, maybe start with:
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eMNRa-KEiQ
EDITED FOR TYPO - sorry
as-is, that the doppler shift presumptions we get from light from extremely distant signals,'must be' what we like to pretend we know it is, in terms of whether or not the big bang exists / the supposed evidence for it.\
I'm more flexible that you might imagine. Takes more than a few bookshelf fillers, to convince me.
---
BUT ok, so OUTER are going faster,..
so what. they have more of a loop / track, to have to travel.
my ( inferred badly ) point was that INNER, over time, would be sucked in and outer would be pushed out, so ones very far away in the regions where matter's not being sucked in , would be likely to survive, whereas ones closer, would be more likely to be eroded, buried, destroyed, etc
That is an incorrect assumption about the galaxy's rotation. The derived "rotation curve" for the Milky Way can be shown as:
View attachment 359542
Even Wikipedia can help:
Galaxy rotation curve - Wikipedia
I'd like to refer you to an easy-to understand series of STEM video books by David Butler, maybe start with:
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eMNRa-KEiQ
EDITED FOR TYPO - sorry
sorry my grammar was a bit off,
i didn't want to spend a lot of time on the post, just infer the difference between inner and outer,
i would've described both, i only described one.