Robert Maynard
Volunteer Moderator
After over seven years of the same types of requests / proposals / demands / incredulity that the game does not revolve around PvP, I would characterise my response as lacking the sympathy I initially had for those who are disappointed that the game doesn't contain a feature that forces players to engage in PvP. The game design was published long ago and Frontier's stance does not seem to have changed regarding the optional nature of PvP with respect to players experiencing and affecting the galaxy.This is strange to me. Your view on this is very binary.
I'd suggest that there are many ways for a determined player to attempt to ruin the experience of those disinclined to engage in PvP - and that, for the same reasons Frontier mentioned, it's unlikely to be achieved.I didn't say my solution must be the end all solution. I said it was a possibility. If you disagree, please provide input on what we could do better instead. I think that all players should have access to open without fear of having their experience ruined. Do you disagree?
I have previously offered the opinion that any Open only content should be new to the game and would not reasonably affect the gameplay of any player in Solo or Private Groups.If PvP gating is so out of the question, what should we do instead? Thats all I'm asking. I don't disagree that my idea was bad, I disagree that nothing should be done because my idea was bad. Does that make sense? You seem to have a plethora of knowledge on this subject, I would love to hear a potential solution from you if I could. I will watch the video in the meantime!