So, tried to have this discussion in the other active thread, but it keeps getting derailed.
Let's assume FD decide they have the time and resources to make Powerplay open only. Not just that, but implement other features that will make Powerplay a lot more interesting and dynamic for players. The lay out their plans and say, well, either we (FD) can make the decision, or we can leave it up to the players as to whether Open Only happens (regardless of the other changes proposed).
Would you support the idea of it going to a public vote and be accepting of the outcome, regardless of which way it goes? Or would you prefer FD make the call, and be accepting of the outcome, regardless of which way it goes?
So, this thread is not about whether you support open only or not. That discussion has plenty of other threads to happen in.
Its about whether you think, should FD say they can and are willing to do it, whether you trust the community to make the right decision (from your perspective) or you trust FD more.
Or maybe you don't think either would make the "right" decision, in which case, you're boned either way
Personally, i don't think FD would do it if it was left up to them. On the public vote side, i'm not certain, i think it could go either way, although i suspect its more likely to be a no.
Due to the contentious nature of the topic, i'm also not sure which is best. Should FD take responsibility for such a wide reaching decision, or should they let the community decide? On the one side, they will get blamed by those who are on the losing side of the vote if they make the call, on the other side they will get criticized for letting the community deicide if it goes to public vote. They are going to get criticized regardless.
Its a hard call, but overall, i think this is something FD should let the community decide, and let the community take the blame either way
Let's assume FD decide they have the time and resources to make Powerplay open only. Not just that, but implement other features that will make Powerplay a lot more interesting and dynamic for players. The lay out their plans and say, well, either we (FD) can make the decision, or we can leave it up to the players as to whether Open Only happens (regardless of the other changes proposed).
Would you support the idea of it going to a public vote and be accepting of the outcome, regardless of which way it goes? Or would you prefer FD make the call, and be accepting of the outcome, regardless of which way it goes?
So, this thread is not about whether you support open only or not. That discussion has plenty of other threads to happen in.
Its about whether you think, should FD say they can and are willing to do it, whether you trust the community to make the right decision (from your perspective) or you trust FD more.
Or maybe you don't think either would make the "right" decision, in which case, you're boned either way
Personally, i don't think FD would do it if it was left up to them. On the public vote side, i'm not certain, i think it could go either way, although i suspect its more likely to be a no.
Due to the contentious nature of the topic, i'm also not sure which is best. Should FD take responsibility for such a wide reaching decision, or should they let the community decide? On the one side, they will get blamed by those who are on the losing side of the vote if they make the call, on the other side they will get criticized for letting the community deicide if it goes to public vote. They are going to get criticized regardless.
Its a hard call, but overall, i think this is something FD should let the community decide, and let the community take the blame either way