Sorry my bad..... Badly written text on my behalf XD I meant the posts that have been made by RedBaron111 earlier!Um, pretty certain I didn't...
Sorry my bad..... Badly written text on my behalf XD I meant the posts that have been made by RedBaron111 earlier!Um, pretty certain I didn't...
Ok, I've learned something useful today. Now, for the bonus round, can you please explain to us what "cooders" stands for?KI is German for AI
Künstliche Intelligenz = Artificial Intelligence
I was hoping it was gona be the Asp Scout...What does "KI" stand for?
An extra O in coders?Ok, I've learned something useful today. Now, for the bonus round, can you please explain to us what "cooders" stands for?
Ok, I've learned something useful today. Now, for the bonus round, can you please explain to us what "cooders" stands for?
You mean you've spotted some idiocy as a common scheme? There's something that doesn't quite fit into this raster though as a Corvette is involved in your quote above. Not saying Corvettes are invincible, but it's a ship you don't pull up as a total noob and on a single weekend. So I can assume this person (with the Corvette) has learned the ropes at least. Something smells fishy here and I'm very curious whether we'll hear some more anecdotes of this sort in the near future, preferably with video proof. I'm pretty sure that theoretically and technically it would be easy for FD to pull up such an NPC killer machine (even cheating!) that wreaks havoc on rare occasions.
But why would they want to do that in the first place? Maybe even the devs need some fun every once in a while or just need to vent some frustration.Or, since everyone and his dog is complaining about NPCs being too easy and it's there way to tell us "careful what you're asking for". Or the victims of this killer machine where identified as cheaters and it's FD's brand new method to deal with these people, who knows? Think about it: the latter would be brilliant (even if self-praise stinks) and would totally justify a cheating NPC...
![]()
I belive he meant coders aka "Developers"Ok, I've learned something useful today. Now, for the bonus round, can you please explain to us what "cooders" stands for?
Sure. It's in the part you skipped.I've skipped a couple of pages.
Has anyone worked out what a "Ki Asp" is yet?
can you please explain to us what "cooders" stands for?
You're leaving me speechless. I'm not talking about skill but how on earth did you reach 'Rear Admiral'? That's a massive grind and nearly impossible to learn nothing on the way...
I just "love" when questions are asked or answers are given to topics that have been asked and answered in a post, usually several times.
As Codger stated, "it's in the parts you skipped", thank you sir!
Quit being a cooder.I just "love" when questions are asked or answers are given to topics that have been asked and answered in a post, usually several times.
As Codger stated, "it's in the parts you skipped", thank you sir!
Am I the only one who thinks "Cooder" would be a great nickname for volunteer moderator role?Quit being a cooder.
this isn't exactly a research group or an academic debate. starting from the very op which is plain nonsense ... in gibberish form. of course entire branches of the conversation, if you could even call it such, are skipped. wild guess, 97,2% of participants only have seen 2,8% of the thread, like the vast majority of threads counting more than 3 pages.
people just drop in here because the 'web 3.0 social activity tab' bombards them with alerts, have a good laugh, then leave. and it goes on and on and on ...
and it's fun, and thus it's ok! call it künstliches gespräch.![]()
I read the entire post and have some sympathy for the OP, who's obviously struggling in English and admitted to having suffered a stroke at some time, so yeah, maybe reading the entire thing will clue you in to the OP's intent. I don't mind a bit of fun but I usually avoid trying to lessen others whatever the circumstances.
Your spelling sucks big deal!![]()
I read the entire post and have some sympathy for the OP