don't try to argue with fanboys, they don't think like normal people.
Don't get me wrong, to follow my analogy maybe the tree missing in one of the tallest, one some find to be the most beautiful for the nice squirrels, but burning the rest of the forest because of it is quite harsh.don't try to argue with fanboys, they don't think like normal people.
Obviously they don't want that. Computing power back then was more powerfull but today is very limited so no offline play anymore...
Sorry but your bolded statement makes no sense at all...
Surely that we got more powerful computers! You know about Moore's Law? Over time, the technology always improve in period of time. In other words, compared to previous, our systems are much more faster and more powerful which we are capable to doing this based on that FD's method in previous time.
Sure, it might increase hardware requirements slightly but it should be not too bad considering that this game engine is well optimized (somewhat, since there is some minor issues such as lagging in supercruise near planets/rings, lag in stations, etc.) but nonetheless, it's pretty well optimized. I think they can do it but for some reason they don't want to.
Yeh, that's what they said.
Like they said there would be an offline mode. Flip a coin?
Maybe it will be "unacceptable" for the company's accountant and the missing ships will make up the core of the first DLC. *shrug*
This isn't about you or me. It's about selling product and what you can get away with.
My post was sarcasm
don't try to argue with fanboys, they don't think like normal people.
Just as a general note, as with pretty much everything on the web these days, video game news sites are metric driven to a degree that would make your head spin. If you want more pressure to be applied it might be an idea to go find a news item on this, then comment as much as is reasonable and hit F5 or stay engaged on a session to an unreasonable degree. Because the gawker/gamespot/etc kids are certainly being measured on how much interest the stories they write on this attract.
Your analogy isn't terribly good. For some people, offline mode was a major selling point; for others it's not just preferred but necessary. Trivialising that is rather unfair, no?
Anger
Denial
Bargaining
Depression
Acceptance
I wonder what stage David Braben is at?
This. Very much this. For some reason, all gaming companies get these die hard supporters that will defend them even when their actions are utterly indefensible, which is why they keep getting away with stuff that would send most other businesses bankrupt. I mean, when people buy a car, a remarkable feat of engineering requiring the combined efforts of experts from several different fields ranging from mechanics to metallurgy to electronics, they rightly expect it to be exactly as described and to work flawlessly from day 1
And this is one of the biggest disappointments for me. Its the same issue I had with Landmark. Big companies come along and make use of funding methods that have been a fantastic boon to indie developers. Big companies that arguably shouldn't need such funding streams or development models. They then screw over people by reneging on promises and put off people from using these crowd funding or early access models in future which will only hurt the indie companies in the end.
Shame on you Frontier. You're not just damaging your own reputation your damaging the reputation and future of the crowd funding model.
Not all Internet is super Fast (This is my sisters) so my brother-inlaw a huge fan of Elite in the past wont be playing this one.
Just give me my money back and I'll leave quietly.
Err no. When I buy a brand new car (and I currently have had one for a year or so), I buy it on the understanding that it has a manufacturer warranty and that things do sometimes go wrong in production and that only given an infinite amount of time and an infinite budget could a car manufacturer produce a perfect car. Obviously an impossible task. It's the same with my house. I bought it brand new from the developer and it came with a "snagging list" of things that needed fixing or re-doing because the house builder didn't get it 100% right first time. There's a 10 year guarantee on the property too (structural).
With software you get diminishing returns from increased testing anyway. You can get 10 developers to test it for 1000 years, or 10,000 players to test it for 1 year. Your budget wouldn't stretch to the former. All it needs is an understanding that making software is hard and that making bug-free software is impossible.
Yes, but a lot of people already paid for the final product...Don't forget that if we stick to his analogy the car doesn't exist yet... its purely a blue print and in your case your home is still a plot of flat land that still required building permission![]()
All it needs is an understanding that making software is hard and that making bug-free software is impossible.