UI feedback - system map and galaxy map
okay, here's my thoughts on galmap and sysmap.
please note: at the moment, I am first and foremost a BGS-player (planner) - so ease of access to information is a primary concern.
I will not focus on just that, but it definitely weighs in on the classification of importance.
General impression:
The new UI looks nice - visually, it is an improvement over the old. But, information gets lost in the many submenus. And within the menus itself, it is often 'form over function'.
Plus, compared to Horizons: some information is flat out missing (!)
As a result of the latter: I still use ED-Horizons for BGS planning, and will for some time.
let's get to the details....
separate sections for system map and galaxy map, with a third section for the bookmark manager in both.
Not going to go too much into design choices, assuming that is 'set'. Instead, going to focus more on the functions, and suggesting fixes/improvements that should be within the 'current build'.
system map:
menu "system information" (system map)
looks good
suggestion:
combine "system information" with "powerplay information" (add powerplay info to the bottom - just to save one submenu)
menu "faction information" (system map)
Issue: active states are not all shown
importance: very high
The current UI only shows 1 state for a faction. But with the post-3.3 BGS, multiple states can be active for any one faction at the same time.
suggestion / fix:
show all faction states in the UI pop-up
additional suggestion: include information about pending states (importance: medium)
Issue: faction information hard to read / low contrast.
importance: high
Bright orange on an orange-grey background picture (or, black on grey&white when highlighted) is quite hard to read.
suggestion / fix:
use a different colour scheme for faction info display (eg: replace the background faction allegiance picture with a black background, and add the allegiance symbol next to the allegiance text)
Issue: current conflict status of wars/civil wars/elections is not shown on systemmap.
importance: high
Descr. While that information is also not in Horizon sysmap - only available in station news or in-flight right panel - it'd be 'very nice-to-have' on system map as well.
(note: old sysmap is really old - in pre-3.3 BGS, we could see conflict status (current winner/loser) by faction influence. sysmap was not adapted to post-3.3 BGS for this)
suggestion / fix:
add a 'conflict' menu button, opening a sub-display that lists pending and active conflicts with either the 'slider-state', or numbers of days won/lost
note: see addendum below (also posted separately at <
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/threa...alaxy-system-map-feedback.578093/post-9219391>)
menu "points of interest" (system map)
looks good - improvement over the old.
Issue: Some POIs are missing
importance: high
Travelling megaships (the ones with the 6-jumps-route, jumping every 2 weeks) and spaceborne installations (the non-landable ones) are not shown on sysmap, or in the POI menu.
suggestion / fix:
- add fixed space-installation and the travelling megaships in their own category under "Points Of Interest"
- also show travelling megaships and spaceborne installations on the system map, with context menu available on the right side menu
menus "Description", "Market", and "Features" (system map, right side)
Issue: for stations and system bodies, information is spread over too many too many submenus.
importance: low/medium
suggestion / fix:
combine those 3 menus into 2:
- for stations and carriers:
- "description" menu - showing the info of "Description" and the "Features" panel (description at the top, facilities below)
- "market" menu - showing the info of "Description" and the "Market" panel (maybe without the faction banner)
- remove "features" menu, as information is included in "description"
- for planetary bodies and stars:
- "description" as is
- "planetary information" as is
(maybe add population information to inhabited planets)
- remove "market information" (=making it 2 menus for the information, just like stations if changed as above)
Issue: Fleetcarriers, some information is missing (owner name and squadron, as available in Horizons)
importance: high
suggestion / fix:
for Fleetcarriers, add the ownership and squadron-allegiance information (maybe even powerplay and faction allegiance of the squadron) to the description panel
menu "local Fleet" and "stored ships" (system map)
issue: when there are many ships stored, the list is "wasting space"
importance: low
suggestion / fix:
- sort them by ship type (atm, it seems to be sorted by the internal ship no./CMDR)
+ either do smaller / more compact boxes for each ships (=equal to the size of bookmark-display?)
- or, show some additional information (i.e. wanted status, no. of seats, cargo/passenger space, and/or the indicators from shipyard about engineered modules to fill the 'empty space')
(note: some suggestions also in the galaxy map section - sync potential changes)
Galaxy Map:
Issue/BUG: all systems show the system state of the system you are currently in (in the description panel)
importance: very high
suggestion / fix:
have them show the actual state of the system (=the system controlling faction)
Issue: only one state is shown for a system on system map
importance: high
factions can have multiple states active at the same time - yet, only one is shown
suggestion / fix:
show all the states of the system controlling faction in the "system information" panel
Issue: filter for "carrier presence" is missing
Importance: medium/high
in menu "map mode", there is no filter for carrier presence (as there is in Horizons)
suggestion / fix:
add the filter "carrier presence" to menu "map mode"
Issue: cannot see which friends are in a system with a 'friend marker'
Importance: high
while I see the 'friend marker' on systems - I cannot see who it is (without exiting map and checking in the in-flight comms panel)
suggestion / fix:
add a button "friends" (maybe on the right side, in between "stored ships" and "system missions"
addendum: while it would be nice to have the same option for squadron members - that would be more a data privacy design choice.
Although I would argue: they are part of the group I am in.
Issue: menu filter "compare by size"... very finicky/hard to use
importance: low
suggestion / fix: ...?
(I dont use it often enough, but it's a little hard to get it working correctly when I do)
Issue: routing/plotting buttons are not together
importance: medium/low
suggestion / fix:
- move the 'display options' to the bottom right ('opposite' of exit button - always visible; just to make some space there)
- move the "target" and "set destination" button to the left, below the "route settings"
Issue: "search field" does not trigger focus-on-system to exact match when pressing 'enter'
importance: medium/low
suggestion / fix:
implement function that "enter" focusses the target system if an exact match was entered into the search field
menu "local Fleet" and "stored ships"
see above (in sysmap section) - sync changes on galmap with sysmap
Issue: ship counter "your Fleet" is only showing 2 digits
importance: low
I have 185 or 186 (187?) ships - counter on the button is showing "18"
suggestion / fix:
show correct number (yes, I think a 4 digit display may be required)
suggested improvement:
add a 'full screen' display box/pop-out button for 'your fleet', that will show the list in a style comparable to the bookmark manager
bookmark manager:
Issue: no 'list all' option is available
importance: high
suggestion / fix:
- add a submenu button "all", that will list all bookmarks in alphabetical order
- see system map improvement point for POI for additional categories (sync changes there with here)
Issue: no 'direct plot route to bookmark' possible
importance: high
Either you have to open the system map and plot a route there, or open the bookmark manager to plot a route directly to the bookmarked object..... far cry from Horizon's 'right-click->plot route'
suggestion / fix:
- add a button 'plot route' next to each bookmark entry
- OR: click-and-hold bookmark entry to plot a route (comparable to the click-and-hold for plotting to objects)
Issue: not enough bookmarks
importance: medium
yes, one cannot mention bookmarks without mentioning the limit ;-)
suggestion / fix:
increase personal bookmarks to a maximum of ... 1024 entries?
That's it for now..... although I'm going to bet I missed a point or three, and might add them later.
A few of these points cross over with this very good post about missing information.
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/threa...-missing-information-in-elite-odyssey.576454/
Frontier: if you want discuss this / would like more feedback - feel free to contact me.
I care enough about this to spent some time on it - more than the 2h I spent organizing my thoughts and writing this up.
now, back to take a look how today's tick worked out (hoping it's finished)
edit/addemdum:
(this is both added to the original post and posted separately - I am not sure how this thread is being parsed)
regarding the "Issue: current conflict status of wars/civil wars/elections is not shown on systemmap." and the subsequent suggestion to implement a "conflict status" menu:
Issue: not visible which Odyssey settlements are actively contested during conflict
importance: high
EDO-settlements are (supposed to be) transferrable not with the 'old' conflict mechanic. Instead, post-conflict owner will be "the faction that won the most Conflict Zones at that particular battle site during the War" - see <
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/threads/elite-dangerous-odyssey-bgs-and-crime-details.575842/>
(yet to be seen how that actually works - or how this works for elections)
Currently, there is no way of seeing which EDO-settlements are actively being fought over (or, how much)
Keep in mind: it can be a long list. (For example, I know a system that now has 98 additional EDO-settlements)
suggestion / fix:
add a list of active battle sites to the 'conflict menu'.
Include an indicator which side has won the most battle zones for each single battle site. (either a counter, or a simple indicator who has the upper hand).
For flair / completeness sake: list the space conflict zones as well.
alternatively:
do not do this "conflict status page" on system map - but as a menu option at a station terminal. (not the Frontline desk - space outposts don't have them, and some systems have no large station or planetary port).
PS: It is a gameplay design decision - whether that info should be accessible from anywhere via system map - or only in-system, at a station. But, it should be available somewhere.