Panther Clipper? Pit-Con.

  • 'It's a clipper," - do we know that? - Do we know how FDev will name it?
  • 'it's the ship we've all been asking for.' - ALL? For sure, I didn't because I don't need it. What exactly have 'we' been asking for? There are no specs given.
  • '... will be disappointing' - and this is how to sow the seed of certain disappointment
There is no need to get upset


I could fill the page with these type of threads
 
Seriously though, I think requiring NPC crew might actually be fun. Granted, maybe not ELEVEN, but yeah... give those NPC crew slots a use for once?
C'mon, that is not a Jaeger from Pacific Rim! It just 2 (3 if we lucky) times bigger than Cutter/T-9.

Even biggest truck IRL is piloted driven by one driver/operator.
 
it's a sliding scale and the ones you list are the more offensive examples of P2W
however
let's has we have a trading CG and these absolutely have a ranking depending on where you finish up

one player has an ARX bought panther with an SCO drive and another player has a T9

whether it matters to you or not is a different argument. personally it does not bother me. but that is a "feels" argument (ie subjective)

But I don't see how that does not objectively tick the P2W boxes. perhaps you can't "win" elite dangerous but you can absolutely win a CG
CGs have always been won for one reason - Time, if you have it you win.

O7
 
There is no need to get upset


I could fill the page with these type of threads
I am pretty much aware that the PC is probably the most requested ship, although I don't understand why anyone apart from players doing serious colonisation would want to fly such a brick. But no matter, you still won't arrive at 'all' no matter how many threads you link.
You still set yourself up for disappointment with your high expectations that it 'is the clipper' and 'disappointing' if it isn't what you want.
 
Nope, that's the rubber decoy Rubbernuke, working as intended
Well we Brits do have previous
6x5RXct.jpg


O7
 
Back
Top Bottom