I'm sorry but nowhere in the EULA it says it's for RL related harassment ONLY. End User Licence Agreement are the rules to which you agree when you use the software provided. In other words, Elite is a game which has certain rules. If a player breaks those rules, they are acting against the agreement with Frontier. It doesn't matter if it was related to RL. All that matter is that it's happened in game.
And the Report Player function in game is there for a reason - to... report players that break the rules. If the rules are vague and open to interpretatio - it's Frontier who will decide on the outcome.
Sure, interpret it as you want. I am just pointing out that quite likely legal departments in ANY online environment put this in for the reasons I mentioned. Its not *only* that, but that is why its there. If you think legal will care about hurt feelings after a T6 is blown up, thats fine. If anyone feels wronged, please indeed do report it and let FD decide. But do keep things in perspective a bit. Its a bit silly to presume legal had a meeting in 2013 and the following happened:
Lawyer 1: "So, we're all done here?"
Lawyer 2: "Hang on, just a sec. What if during a CG a T6 is attacked for the third time?"
Lawyer 1: "What about it?"
Lawyer 2: "Couldnt that be harassment?"
Lawyer 1: "Well, give me some context. Did the trader influence the attacker's BGS?"
Lawyer 2: "Somewhat, he did offload some gold to a rival outpost..."
Lawyer 1: "Did he intentionally jeoparidze the BGS activities of the attacker?"
Lawyer 2: "Could be, but if so did the attacker know of that intent?"
Lawyer 1: "Hmm, suppose not, but he might. What was the attacker flying anyway?"
Lawyer 2: "An FdL."
Lawyer 1: "Engineered?"
Lawyer 2: "Oh, thats miles from release, or thats what Sandro told me."
Lawyer 1: "Yeah, but an FdL wont be in either."
Lawyer 2: "Crap, really?"
Lawyer 1: "Yeah, really."
Lawyer 2: "So then its not a FdL?"
Lawyer 1: "Okay, make it a Python."
Lawyer 2: "Isnt a T6 faster than a Python?"
Lawyer 1: "Thats not really the point is it?"
Lawyer 2: "Well, its not really harassment if you refuse to just fly away."
Lawyer 1: "Thats blaming the victim, shame on you."
Lawyer 2: "Oh common, it is just a game man."
Lawyer 1: "I guess so. You know what, just put something vague in there about not being a dringlooze."
Lawyer 2: "How about 'Dont be nasty or someone may do something, possibly?'"
Lawyer 1: "Sounds fair. Lunch?"
Lawyer 2: "We're still in Cambridge, remember? Lets get out plane back to the continent and have some proper food."
Lawyer 1: "Good thinking, I'll get my coat."