And for only $115, you too can race around theGalaxy sector stars systemplanets!

And for only $115, you too can race around theGalaxy sector stars systemplanets!
Meh, I made $130 profit selling my spare Carrack on the grey market...some minor profits selling other stuff as Ci¬G keep hiking their prices. I trim or add stuff depending on what it is or if I perhaps see a use for it in game at some point. The few ships I have change on a weekly basis sometimes, I had a reshuffle of some older stuff that didn't have LTI, couldn't find an LTI CCU or token for it...but CiG stepped right in and are offering 10 year insurance on recent purchases during the expo...simply a matter of reshuffling stuff to take advantage at no cost to me. The only ships I won't sell or melt are the Pirate Caterpillar and Cutlass Black.. I like them.Ah, so this is why it was wise to invest early! Invest early, save money! Just think about the hundreds of pounds people might save by investing thousands early!
Only fools will wait for the game to release for a standard price and then actually earn the ships in game with in-game currency.
The prices have gone up since you last looked...can't get a Cutlass for under $150 nowadays
Anyway, I look on it as a good thing all in all, reducing the time spent in QT was essential....especially for folks with the smaller ships, good move by Ci¬G.
Didn't see that one either...seems the expo has some fairly decent deals here and there (relatively) That Cutty will come with 10 year insurance too![]()
Wait until after the June 2020 court hearing before getting back in is my advice.Despite all the lies and predatory marketing and incessant delays..... despite all I now know about CIG and their mismanagement.... i still am tempted to buy back in.
Shows how desperate I am for the type of space game SC has the potential to be, and how effective their marketing really is.![]()
You certainly aren't alone...I was exactly the same after refunding in 2017 before 3.0 came along with planets...and before they shut the doors on refunds. I watched the 2016/'17 demo at Citcon where the wheels fell off the rover and was so disgusted, I cashed in my original concierge account...relatively simple too, 3 days and a couple of emails to concierge support and my full pledge was returned... minus VAT of course.Despite all the lies and predatory marketing and incessant delays..... despite all I now know about CIG and their mismanagement.... i still am tempted to buy back in.
Shows how desperate I am for the type of space game SC has the potential to be, and how effective their marketing really is.![]()
This sounds an awful lot like VAT fraud. They've been trying to play games with VAT before which is always a particularly bright shining red warning light…3 days and a couple of emails to concierge support and my full pledge was returned... minus VAT of course.
Despite all the lies and predatory marketing and incessant delays..... despite all I now know about CIG and their mismanagement.... i still am tempted to buy back in.
Shows how desperate I am for the type of space game SC has the potential to be, and how effective their marketing really is.![]()
Well after realizing that I made a blunder on my purchases, I now have $85 in store credit at SC. How it happened: Well, last expo I bought the Aero LTI pack and upgraded to the 600i (which I still own and love to fly). I had my original package too, upgraded to the Titan, which is $85. What I didn't realize is that the Aero LTI package came with the game until today!!!!
I also have a $15 graycat and a $40 Hangar I can part ways with, so I'm thinking about getting the Prospector for $155, which would be an additional $15.
Or
I can add an Andromeda for $225 and double my 600i's cargo capacity (I worry about this, just incase they turn the elevator into a cargo hold and increase the ships cargo capacity.
I'm leaning towards the Prospector.... Any help would be appreciated.
oh and no I will not refund![]()
Finally escaping the single malt haze and preparing for the flight home in a few days.
What on earth have I missed?
3 days and a couple of emails to concierge support and my full pledge was returned... minus VAT of course.
It is VAT fraud. All payments in full have to be refunded, it's UK law.This sounds an awful lot like VAT fraud. They've been trying to play games with VAT before which is always a particularly bright shining red warning light…
All sorted a long time ago...that's why I pay my accountant decent moneyIt is VAT fraud. All payments in full have to be refunded, it's UK law.
@Mole HD get that VAT refunded back to you. If they don't and you're in UK send the info to HMRC; if not in UK then send the info to me and I'll report it for you.
On a related note: did your refund originate from the same company/account that you paid initially? If not, report that too: it's against UK money laundering regulations - they have to refund via the same payment channel as the original payment.
I don't think it's that rosy. Like everything else about CIG the math just doesn't add up. If funding was as good as the backers believe then why did they have to take a loan? Why did they take on an investor when (even mentioned in OA's recent vid) Chris Roberts was harping on about being able to create his dream game without anyone looking over his shoulder? Even their own financial report they released last year indicated they had run out of money. If the whale milk was still sustaining the project none of that would be necessary. Once the Calder money is gone it's over. I wait in anticipation of EA, MS or some other big corp swooping in to snap up this "amazing" project as others have claimed.My personal view is the current status quo will continue for a considerable while. We have not reached the tipping point yet. Funding levels are still pretty good. A careful reduction of staff to right size to their incoming pledges in the New Year would allow them to sail on wards for a decent while. My guess is as they reach the tipping point and they can no longer reduce staff without it being obvious the game will be declared released. That way they will have delivered something. If release is a success they will continue if not then they have a justifiable reason to close down.
That's not surprising though. CIG are an open joke now. People used to give them some measure of respect for the money they gained but even people like in the IG games video are openly mocking the company now. Who would sign up for that?They are still trying to fill 76 vacancies.
Jobs
With multiple US and European offices, CIG employs the gaming industry’s most talented people on its most exciting project, the Star Citizen space SIMcloudimperiumgames.com
That's somewhere in the region of 1/7th of their total staffing needs. That is just insane and one has to wonder why they have so many vacancies, some of which have been open for a very long time. Can they not find people with the right skills? Hard to believe. Are they too demanding? Hard to believe when you see "senior" developers at CIG who look like they are fresh out of school. Maybe word gets around, people are not applying? Its believable if you are a skeptic and people in the industry talk. CR's management style is well known and not everyone wants to be micromanaged or told to rework the same thing multiple times or deal with crazy deadlines (remember the whole "we intentionally make unrealistic deadlines to motivate staff" idiocy?). Perhaps the crunch culture is a turn off for many, when you can get an equivalent or better salary elsewhere with less crunch (the gaming industry is well known for crunch and many devs i've known who worked in gaming were only too happy to get out and work on less glamorous projects). Maybe they also have high staff turnover, meaning every time they fill a position, another one opens up. That would requires a close analysis of the vacancies over time, something i'm not willing to do.