and you are doing it again, i didn't say any of that you mention. you only arranged those sentences as if they were mine to validate your own argument, I never said such a thing.So, you're saying SC lends itself more to being a releasable product (which it doesn't, since it can't be released at the moment) than a machinima maker (which it does very well)?
Or are you saying that SC doesn't lend itself at all to being a machinima maker (which would conflict with your post with the machinima video).
And you're saying my opinion is biased?!
But if you want to suggest SC is a releasable product, awesome, we can review it like one! You want to go down that road? I'm totally up for that!
you are very funny man, first I put a video about gameplay and your only reaction is to ridicule who made the video (I still don't understand why), then I put a video of machinima and your only reaction is to say that sc only works for that,
so I'll put your own sentences as questions:
SC lends itself more to being a releasable product? absolutely not, that does not mean that it is not playable and enjoyable right now, it still has a lot of bugs to fix and game play to develop, ( at what point have I mentioned or discused this in my previous post? never, as said before you've just accommodated this to your argument
is star citizen a good screenshot simulator? Sure, but it's not only that,
then the correct sentence would be sc is a game in development that can already be played and enjoyed and that also has a good photo mode, and yes, it still has a lot of bugs to fix and a lot of gameplay to develop.