That's exactly the goal for a lot of ships which will handle standardized containers. The first ship to be able to handle those standardized container will be the MPUV Cargo, not the Mustang (too small). The Mustang is just a starter with limited cargo interaction.
Or you can call it "Cargo system refactor"
Less than 10 systems. No definition/metric for SM stabilized has been given.
Ask Elon Musk about his ships. He most certainly defined the release date with something like "When my ships not explode every 3 trips". "When something works pretty good" is a perfectly acceptable definition of the end of a testing phase.
You don't like it but it's true
CIG Network people have been working on nothing for the past year. There is no Star Citizen either, by the way.
You don't like it but it's true
What do you mean "for the past year"? I thought server meshing was oven ready in 2018. (Imagine my surprise)
If you say so. But it doesn't surprise me looking at the glacial pace of actual releases.
This definition is actually a pretty precise metric, as opposed to "sometime maybe server meshing". Of course, this is only what you imagine Elon could have said, not a quote. It is still interesting that you spontaneously came up with a hypothetical quote that is much more specific than whatever CIG's communication has been.
They didn't have network engineers before and just made the concierge network chef, becuase he is best experienced with pipe(lines).
If we trust Mr. Agent then it got a rework end of 2020. You know that yourself.
Sadly, I’ve learned over the years that there is a huge chasm between what is ethical, and what is legal. While I consider CIG to be an utterly unethical abuse of the crowd funding model, almost as much as I consider Hollywood’s accounting practices to be contemptibly corrupt, I’m sure Chris and Ortwin’s experiences in Hollywood (and the German equivalent) has ensured that their continued plundering of this project is strictly legal.
Star Citizen was never multiplayer. Ever.
More than 2 and less than 10. I can't find the quote where CR talked about it but it was single digit.
Perhaps for you. For me, it's clearly a worthwhile statement. Having a stable server code is one of the most important goal to achieve before releasing a game. Do you know one company releasing a game with an unstable netcode ? (irony inside).
So, what you are saying, is that it is possible for something to be worked on by many people and still not materialise? You get my point
Yes! Because surprise surprise, this software is in development! Plans change!So, what you are saying, is that it is possible for something to be worked on by many people and still not materialise? You get my point
Maybe after 10 years you'd think they would have a more solid plan, and software foundation. It's still like an early prototype, from an engineering standpoint.
This implication does not work in either direction. "Plans change" does not imply "software development", and "software development" does not imply "plans change". It can happen, it may not. Anyway, this also invalidates the implication of one of your comments - that something being worked on must mean it actually exists.
you should never trust me about anything
