You ignored the inconvenient differences to try and make them sound more similar. Bringing in Valheim out of nowhere to try and ride on their respectable coat-tails.
Look, here you are doing it:
But I'm glad we agree on where they differ though
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
You ignored the inconvenient differences to try and make them sound more similar. Bringing in Valheim out of nowhere to try and ride on their respectable coat-tails.
Look, here you are doing it:
But I'm glad we agree on where they differ though
Yes but the context there was:
Should they be treating this alpha product as a released one, and taking dividends & ROI payments from the monies raised?
What's your answer Ant?
Should they be?
So it's early alpha development, ok.
So it can't be alpha since it needs all core mechnisms in game? Like a galaxy map?
No matter the talks of SC, they keep raking in the moneys. I'd say even releasing it would have no effect, or maybe sell more even. Why not then? CR doesn't wanna hear it.
I believe the ToS thing you have to agree to with every update now is solely for CR. Everyone else on the planet knows this thing is barely alpha, so it's only for that 1 fella in denial.
MCV Develop 974 January 2022
content.yudu.com
SC "large scale mmorpg" by 2027, Squadron 42 out within 1-2 years
Looking forward to its release. Will that be straight from alpha to release then? Another game seemed to do that earlier this year, but has a few hiccups.
So it's a playable alpha, or it's pre-alpha with a lot more bugs and less stability?
Ahh...
Ok then, 100% Alpha and can be reviewed as such.
Bearing in mind it's alpha, it sucks they have no core game or galaxy map etc.
No, it won't. Will enter a beta stage once 4.0 comes out with another system. Then they'll fix the bugs and sometime in 2027, hopefully with atleast 10 systems or so release it as a 1.0.
Wow it was sure a shock to see Joe Blobers throwing a fit in the first comment of an article bringing light to how scummy CIG and the rest of the Roberts web of fraud is.
I mean, did you even read what he said?
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
Not really when it has been already 10+ years of alpha and 400+ millions wasted. It simply indicates very serious technical and management issues that can´t seem to be resolved in any reasonable manner.
It's still an Alpha. There is no "not really". To any question of "Is star citizen finished?" "Is Star Citizen a released game?" You will hear "No, it's an Alpha" Everywhere on the SC website it says it's an Alpha. There is no debate about it.
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
There is indeed a very clear "not really". There are alphas and alphas. This alpha is quite different to others in that it has been stuck without delivering a single product or even going to beta for 10 years and 400 millions wasted. It is a likely indicative of technical and management problems that cant seem to be resolved in any reasonable manner.
I wonder what percentage of backers would agree that the game has enough content and working gameloops to enable it to be a full-time game.
I bet the number is very small.
Perhaps CIG should release a new stat chart showing the high amount of playtimes and concurrency to support your claim.
And? It's still an Alpha. Or are you attempting to argue it's ready for a commercial release since it's not really an alpha? The devs say it's not ready, everyone says it's not ready, yet you say it is?
I think that was the article's comments section that got Blobers banned from MOP
FTFY
Ok, that's only 5 years from now. So we should see that in Version 14 or 15 of these threads.
Oh come on, they already have like 2 other systems in active development.FTFY
Ok, that's only 5 years from now. So we should see that in Version 14 or 15 of these threads.
MCV Develop 974 January 2022
content.yudu.com
SC "large scale mmorpg" by 2027, Squadron 42 out within 1-2 years
Thanks for the link, i'll have a good read of that later.
2027 thought. Jeebus. SQ42 in 1-2 years? We've heard that before. Believe it when i see it.
Chris being there is just going to slow things down even more. Imagine all the pixels that will need changing colour!
Yes, we know they love to splatter alpha all over their website, but they still market it like a released product. Look at their flashy videos. Look at all the "PLAY NOW" buttons and text.
CIG are a clear case of wanting to have their cake and eat it.
And backers do exactly the same. They go all over the internet preaching how good the game is right now, but the moment there is criticism, ITS ALPHA.
Go on, deny it. I dare you. I double dare you.
10 systems by 2027 out of 110 sold and paid for.
In a 1.0 release, which CIG were keen to stress that all 110 systems would be done by after CR's earlier statement about 5-10 systems on release.
Any proof? Only ever seen them talk about Nyx and Pyro, never seen any actual flyby of the system. For a company who like to show off every single asset for marketing reasons, they show very little about these 2.
Also, seeing as planets were meant to be coming online so much faster now that the tools & pipelines are in place why is it taking them so long?