Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12

rootsrat

Volunteer Moderator
Some people from my community are doing the Daymar Rally right now. While it's rather cool in concept, the performance is unacceptable to watch on stream, it's a slideshow almost.

And when I asked "Aren't you afraid to land your buggy on the upside down? You're going so fast and flying through the air..." the answer was "Well, it works that if we do, it just flips us over to the upright position" :cool:

And just a few days ago, someone had a proper go at me on Facebook SC group when I dared to mention that the proper physics is really lacking in Star Citizen. "Don't lie, of course there is proper physics in SC!" :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:🤪:poop:
 
That's not my opinion but the opinion written by hundred of ED players (yes I read the ED forums).
An opinion about planets by hundreds from a community FDev listens to. They also listened to the community, back when it was voted on, that folks only wanted ships developed, not walking around.

Like EDO trying to catch up with the whole FPS part of SC ? Or walking in station trying to catch up with walking in ship of SC ?
After FDev added legs, it became apparent that same community, that didnt want walking around, wants to walk around their own ships. Wait, what? FDev has since focussed on, as you say, catching up...but not to SC, they're catching up to their communities changed desires. Does CIG focus on what their community wants? A playable game? Doesn't seem like it.

Water in Cyberpunk is crap and nobody care because it's not vital for the game, like in SC.

So you're saying if it's ok for Cyberpunk to have crap water, then it's ok for SC to? So you agree, at the least, that that water in SC looks like crap?

Even though I think SC is a scam, and cant wait for it to go away, everything they've released is pretty, like a freshly detailed car on a used car lot, with a few stripped bolts on the oil pan. But the water shown in those clips is like the pan has dropped off. Funny to think...water is what's going to sink SC LOL.

(because, like it or not, SC is alpha).
Bingo, BINGO! SCNR
Show us your card, and you'll get your bobble-head prize. :)

SC is not even close to being Alpha...just concepts.
 
Being married to a game is odd.

Noisy bed-hopping is still amusing though ;)

Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/EliteDangerous/comments/101vxux/odyssey_returning_players_experience/


I played Odyssey since day 1 alpha/beta, wasn’t ruff for me, smooth like butter actually but then I knew better then to expect a good FPS from a space sim, just saying. I tested it, played the ground stuff like a good boy and it met my expectations of garbage so I was satisfied.

ED has less detail then SC but ED wins the content. ED has a lot more stuff to do and is not based on make believe.

In SC I have a cattapiller, constellation, cutlas black (my fav) aurora, freelancer max and a hornet. I loved the ships but the bugs made me mental and just flying around that one system was also limiting.
source
Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/EliteDangerous/comments/101vxux/odyssey_returning_players_experience/j2ri04v/
Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/EliteDangerous/comments/101vxux/odyssey_returning_players_experience/j2rxbc6/
 
Last edited:
You know people can play more than one game, even if just to see what all the fuss is about.....it's not hard, you could try it yourself, play a released game every now and then to see how the other side plays!
For sure I know. But saying SC is 'concept' is just not true. You don't claim quitting a game for SC just for 'concepts'. And you don't play 50 hours with only 'concepts'.
 
It's true that ED will never catch up to that experience.

Anyway, had a couple of secs and thought it was time for a new meme.
View attachment 342409
Pretty sure I read somewhere that the game is already released and you get 4 successful releases a year which deliver a AAA gaming experience !!


It must be true it is on the Internet !! :ROFLMAO:
 
Back
Top Bottom