Most likely being worked on. They showed test videos with low gravity in an older post about planetary work. i suspect they did not want to have a more hilarious situation with the demo and people accidentally jumping very high or the rover suddenly becoming airborne for a very long time before falling down.
Star Citizen Thread v6
- Thread starter Brett C
- Start date
- Status
Most likely being worked on. They showed test videos with low gravity in an older post about planetary work. i suspect they did not want to have a more hilarious situation with the demo and people accidentally jumping very high or the rover suddenly becoming airborne for a very long time before falling down.
Someone on Reddit asked "have we seen a full cargo run yet in 3.0"? It's interesting to see the many and varied justifications in the replies for why the answer is "no, we haven't".
https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitize..._we_seen_a_30_full_cargo_run_yet_pick_up_and/
https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitize..._we_seen_a_30_full_cargo_run_yet_pick_up_and/
Or most likely it is bugged at hilarious levels and they couldn't get fixed for demo.
As with every feature CIG produces.
link doesnt work
That's pretty much the inevitable fate of SC.
My last few final hopes that this mess would someday turn into an actual game that resembled anything that was pitched went away in the last presentation where they shown even more out of scope feature creep, mixed with completely on-rails, scripted "gameplay" that somehow still broke anyway.
Yeah I realize that from some reason whenever I post adress here it just delete last part of it...strange
anyway you can find it on DS twitter account scroll a bit down
Last edited:
Let me try... https:///zabafkeh
Yup. The strawpoll dot com bit gets stripped off. I just Googled zabafkeh.
Last edited:
@Wotherspoon
You aren't the only person who has looked at the funding graph and concluded there's more going out than coming in. I can never satisfy myself about what's happening with it because they refuse to release their financials, it feels like chasing ghosts.
Quick observation - before the disasterous Gamescon presentation I'd get "the truth is probably somewhere in the middle" when talking about SC. However during and after that whole week of 3.0 and future 3.0 I'm getting "oh maybe it is that bad"
You aren't the only person who has looked at the funding graph and concluded there's more going out than coming in. I can never satisfy myself about what's happening with it because they refuse to release their financials, it feels like chasing ghosts.
Quick observation - before the disasterous Gamescon presentation I'd get "the truth is probably somewhere in the middle" when talking about SC. However during and after that whole week of 3.0 and future 3.0 I'm getting "oh maybe it is that bad"
That strawpoll has healthy number of participants. Seems web has woken up to all SC saga, quite believable distribution of answers.
Until the Shillizen finds it...
This is the link I think you all are talking about. I am not aware that the link itself breaks any forum rules but due to the auto-correction I ll just put it here in adultered form
https://111strawpoll.111com/111zabafkeh
just delete the three "111" clusters
https://111strawpoll.111com/111zabafkeh
just delete the three "111" clusters
How do you know they are using that tool?
I believe he is being satirical.
Is that Miles Eckhart's subsumption tree from 3.0?
Not all of it I think. I'm reasonably certain, from the presentation, that there is some tight loop controlling eye jitter.
To have that number unfilled for a project of this size is not common practice. I know because I asked someone who knows about 6 months ago and they said as much. 6 months later they still have a large number of place unfilled. Word gets around, quickly.
- Status