Broken, unfinished, constantly "fundraising", lies from day 1, $450 million spent, 9 years an alpha etc.
There really is no comparison to be made at all.
Yep, which is why I'm not going to make a comparison. SC does its thing... you either buy into it, or you don't. I backed E: D more in their Kickstarter than SC, so I haven't really kept track. Played it recently though, and it's pretty good (when it works). It has wonderful coherence from ship, to on-foot gameplay. That's how you do it. The next update sounds good, but then next updates always do.
SC is an alpha sold as a real game when it suits (mainly for tax purposes and lawsuits by irate engine devs). Ships are sold based on future gameplay and plots of land sold, along with continually broken releases that never really get better. FD should have marked it early access (so in some ways they are similar), but they don't sell Panther Clipper pictures either. I find it comical that people hold up SC monthly updates when a lot of the time SC cut content or kick the can down the road. People who back SC are used to it now, while EDO has shown a lot of players ED side what that feels like.
And yet, SC's 'verse is currently filled with Elite exiles. Go figure.
But now its hit the share price, which really ups the ante- and on Brabens reason and calling card.
Yup, which puts the whole future of E: D as a going concern / IP in doubt, if it wasn't already.
I think DB is concerned with Frontier as a whole, and has delegated.
If that's true, I wonder if he's going to roll his sleeves up more and delegate the 'company' to others in the future. Time will tell I suppose.