Victories in Aurus and Senocidi! HIP 20850 is progressing strongly enough, and HIP 23716 has pulled forward just enough to project very slightly above completion. Mind that these cases can vary wildly; it relies on some Commanders acting to help secure that investment, and also on other Commanders not withdrawing as the end of the cycle approaches!
Alert at 07:50 3rd May 3309:
HIP 20850 Alert 64% — Indra 27 Ly, 94 Ls planet
Slightly less risky than before:
HIP 23716 Alert 42% — Taranis 18 Ly, 2314 Ls starport, 2351 Ls outpost, 2354 Ls planet
Clean-up:
Hyades Sector ZZ-O b6-1 Control 28% — Taranis 26 Ly, empty
Col 285 Sector XN-Z b14-5 Alert 10% — Hadad 32 Ly, empty
Has this to do with the way that M. Hadad only placed four Alerts this week? I was considering possible explanations; the best I could imagine was that placing farther Alerts—as we have been forcing it to do using its turn-by-turn rules—expends more of its Alert capacity.
Either way it is quite good that you mentioned that, for I had planned two more open harvests, and probably could have completed one already were it not for the attempts to inspire it elsewhere! These are just to continue clearing that ten light-year sphere around Bagalya though, on which we were making a start now because there were so many of them. Will it be fine to take one more system there such as Col 285 Sector OB-D b13-2, then direct any extra time at a different Maelstrom?
We can also clear many more than eight in a cycle if you need; that is simply a case of clearing many empty systems rather than one strong inhabited system. Fotlandjera alone probably was worth eight empty Control systems!
Alert at 07:50 3rd May 3309:
HIP 20850 Alert 64% — Indra 27 Ly, 94 Ls planet
Slightly less risky than before:
HIP 23716 Alert 42% — Taranis 18 Ly, 2314 Ls starport, 2351 Ls outpost, 2354 Ls planet
Clean-up:
Hyades Sector ZZ-O b6-1 Control 28% — Taranis 26 Ly, empty
Col 285 Sector XN-Z b14-5 Alert 10% — Hadad 32 Ly, empty
So that's 11 controls cleared to match last week. There's a minor science opportunity here if you only clear at most one more control at Hadad this week (so 7 but not 8 total) and then are able to follow that up with at least 8 cleared the following week.
(As always: please don't let that stop you clearing 8 locally this week if necessary for local strategy)
Has this to do with the way that M. Hadad only placed four Alerts this week? I was considering possible explanations; the best I could imagine was that placing farther Alerts—as we have been forcing it to do using its turn-by-turn rules—expends more of its Alert capacity.
Either way it is quite good that you mentioned that, for I had planned two more open harvests, and probably could have completed one already were it not for the attempts to inspire it elsewhere! These are just to continue clearing that ten light-year sphere around Bagalya though, on which we were making a start now because there were so many of them. Will it be fine to take one more system there such as Col 285 Sector OB-D b13-2, then direct any extra time at a different Maelstrom?
We can also clear many more than eight in a cycle if you need; that is simply a case of clearing many empty systems rather than one strong inhabited system. Fotlandjera alone probably was worth eight empty Control systems!