I get all my tea as loose leaf.
Yep. You wont get far in this World telling the truth, unless you wrap it in fancy cellofane and perfume.Just need to vent a bit, and this seemed as good a place as any to do so, because I saw these figures being trotted out as "positive" in the news for showing that "While cases are rising, hospitalisations are still on a downward trend".
What's off about this picture? Well, I took the liberty of highlighting it.
View attachment 278968
So the infection data is almost a week more recent than the hospitalisation figures
What do we know about hospitalisations? They lag behind infections. By about a week. The figures for the 30th of November represent infections on the 23-24th of November. Not from the 6th of December. So if we correct for both the difference in where the data runs up to, and the lag from infection to hospitalisation, that's around two weeks, which we can account for and then overlay the graphs on each other to see the relationship much more clearly, and also to see how much longer it's going to be before we see any potential knock-on effects of this uptick in cases represented in hospitalisation figures.
View attachment 278970
As we see, the lines have a lot of places where they track pretty damn closely, since those hospitalisations are among the people included in those new case figures a week earlier. Most importantly for the purposes of how this was being interpreted by media however, is that the slight uptick at the end of the hospitalisation figures is pretty much concurrent with the first detection of the most recent uptick in cases.
It would sure be nice if it turns out that hospitalisations do not track with cases this time around. But there's certainly no reason to expect it and the data won't be in for weeks, so it's exceptionally irresponsible to suggest the absence of data is indicative of something good.
The big problem seems to be that from the available data, an awful lot more Omicron cases are reinfections of people who had antibodies from previous infection, which should in a sane world be the final nail in the coffin (perhaps a poor choice of words) to the idea of mass infection as a viable strategy for quickly developing population immunity.... Honestly, with the data we have, there is no clear indication that Omicron is mild (it's mostly wishful thinking like always), but it sure is contagious, even in a population with a high degree of immunity.
There is actually a rather large immunity in the population around the world, but it decreases over time, and it does seem that it is less efficient against Omicron. We are getting used to "the daily numbers", and often forget that the true number of infections is much larger than the number of positive tests. Even in Denmark, with most testing being done per capita, the number of daily infections is probably 10-30 times higher than the numbers. That actually changes a lot in our understanding of the pandemic. The IFR for one is much lower than what you get if you just divide deaths by positives. That might be worth remembering when hell breaks lose.The big problem seems to be that from the available data, an awful lot more Omicron cases are reinfections of people who had antibodies from previous infection, which should in a sane world be the final nail in the coffin (perhaps a poor choice of words) to the idea of mass infection as a viable strategy for quickly developing population immunity...
Except ours, who have been happy to run at the highest levels our healthcare system can possibly cope with without exceeding capacity, effectively applying the logic of "just-in-time" supply chains to healthcare, assuming that if we match supply and demand that's the optimum situation, as if there's no conceivable scenario where demand might increase and we don't have the capacity to meet it...That is why every government around the globe is concerned about hospitals not being able to cope, because no treatment increase the fatality (dramatically, as seen in India).
That's a weekly report chart, so all data points are a week apart. But that is really obviously not the important thing!Notice that the last data point is one week old. ICU also rising at same rate.
(Waving frantically! )I wonder when someone will realize the severity of the current situation. Right now they are just poking it with a stick.
I've also been looking at the daily reports:That's a weekly report chart, so all data points are a week apart. But that is really obviously not the important thing!
(Waving frantically! )
The epidemiologists know, judging by their expostulations on Twitter. Gauteng province data vs other provinces gives ahorrendouspossible picture of the future -
Because it is much more infectious, and is now established as recombinant capable, it can mutate at an unprecedented rate in HIV populous southern Africa, who have intercurrent infection chronically with Lord knows what RNA viruses nobody else knows from exotic species exposure, but because that population has a median age of 24 years, fatalities there may be way too low to alert watchers elsewhere.
Thymus gland involutes in humans, losing function from the 20's going forward. After 65-70, immunity falls off a cliff. So vaccination effects wear off exactly in the wrong place, the increasingly gullible elderly.
I shall be glad to be wrong this time. Fortunately, it is not easy to predict, making error larger.
Date | NICD daily report adm | Oxygen | Current admit | ICU |
04-12-21 | 110 | 475 | 3255 | 283 |
05-12-21 | 28 | 473 | 3268 | 278 |
06-12-21 | 175 | 510 | 3517 | 308 |
07-12-21 | 383 | 542 | 3798 | 354 |
08-12-21 | 374 | 622 | 4252 | 374 |
09-12-21 | 453 | 662 | 4795 | 398 |
Latest things from the UK - they reckon the omicron infections are doubling every 2 days and will be the dominant strain by next week. It's a fast mover ...
The Guardian has seen leaked advice from UKHSA for Javid marked “official, sensitive” saying: “The key point is that under a range of plausible scenarios, stringent action is needed on or before 18 December 2021 if doubling times stay at 2.5 days. Even if doubling times rise to around 5 days, stringent action is likely still needed in December.”
It adds: “The rapid spread of Omicron means that action to limit pressures on the health system might have to come earlier than intuition suggests.” Its calculations suggest that even if Omicron causes a less severe hospitalisation rate of 1% or 0.5% compared with Delta’s 1.5%, then “stringent national measures’” would be needed by 18 December at the latest.
The Scottish govt released an evidence paper https://www.gov.scot/publications/omicron-scotland-evidence-paper/"Sturgeon warned of a “potential tsunami” of Omicron infections as the new variant brings “the fastest exponential growth we have seen in this pandemic so far”.
Thanks for the data.Javid advised to take ‘stringent’ Covid measures within a week, leak reveals
Exclusive: Health officials say urgent action needed to avoid mass hospitalisations and overwhelming the NHSwww.theguardian.com
The Scottish govt released an evidence paper https://www.gov.scot/publications/omicron-scotland-evidence-paper/
We've had up to 2000 cases recently, now suddenly 5000, and the projection graph based on that current 5000 cases (which WAS the upper end of worse case) is 15000 daily cases plus in 2 weeks. In a country with 5 million people.
It's possibly even worse than they are predicting, since there's no tracking of the other version.using S-gene target failure as a proxy for Omicron
27th Nov to 10th Dec is umm... 2 weeks. You saying it takes over from DELTA in 3 weeks?Latest things from the UK - they reckon the omicron infections are doubling every 2 days and will be the dominant strain by next week. It's a fast mover ...
What's the x-axis here? Days of year 2021?More data from SA. The hospitalisations, oxygenation and ICU are now rising faster than ever before during the pandemic:
View attachment 280994
Omicron is NOT mild. Thanks for all the fish!