I would like to see QE2 go to NZ and tell them what to do. For that matter it'd be hilarious in the UK.Uh... England, Japan, New Zealand, Belgium, Canada and many other countries are monarchies aswell.
I would like to see QE2 go to NZ and tell them what to do. For that matter it'd be hilarious in the UK.Uh... England, Japan, New Zealand, Belgium, Canada and many other countries are monarchies aswell.
I would like to see QE2 go to NZ and tell them what to do. For that matter it'd be hilarious in the UK.
Erm the Thargoids with their flower power shipsHmm, but...
...lets say we would stumble over another living alien faction then the Thargoids, and both the Feds and the Empire would each send one of their capital class ships...
...whom do you think they would trust more after that first impression? The Feds and its rather dark and martial looking Farragut-class battlecruiser...
![]()
...or the Empire and its bright, elegant and majestic Majestic-class Interdictor?
![]()
You do realise that parliament is the only one that can dissolve our parliament, I can't see a PM giving up power for a ideology. Iirc it was at the time that parliament was created that it was written in to stop the monarchy taking control again.In 1975, the queen summarily dissolved the Australian Parliament. It is possible.
And just because the world has trended towards democracy , we shouldn't assume that this is inevitable. In point of fact, it may become increasingly impractical as populations continue to increase.
In fact, I could easily see a movement to restore the monarchy in the UK within our lifetime. On the one hand, you have a government that seems increasingly out of touch with its citizens; on the other, a royal family that is universally beloved, tied to a shining memory of a lost golden age. How long would the government need to disappoint its citizens before they give up on the concept entirely? When it doesn't seem to matter which side you vote for, you get screwed either way?
Then all they have to do is keep their word; govern well for a decade or two, and their power will be sealed.
You do realise that parliament is the only one that can dissolve our parliament, I can't see a PM giving up power for a ideology. Iirc it was at the time that parliament was created that it was written in to stop the monarchy taking control again.
It's understandable why; people see the Federation, and they imagine United Federation of planets, from Star Trek; a peaceful Coalition, rather than the capitalistic oligarchy it truly is. They see the Empire, and they envisioned Caesar's Legion from Fallout, rather than the much more complicated thing it truly is.
Both Federation and Empire are very capitalistic. The Federation doesn't have a truly free market, because it's more cronyism. The Empire has a worse image of being stratified, oppressive due to the use of slaves and an unelected monarchy.
Erm I was talking about the UK parliament I wasn't clear![]()
1975 Australian constitutional crisis - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Specifically "The events of the Dismissal led to only minor constitutional change. The Senate retained its power to block supply, and the Governor-General the power to dismiss government ministers. However, these powers have not since been used to force a government from office. Kerr was widely criticised by Labor supporters for his actions, resigned early as Governor-General, and lived much of his remaining life abroad."
So the representative of the Crown still has full authority to dismiss parliament.
Erm I was talking about the UK parliament I wasn't clear![]()
The Alliance puts it best; they sympathize more with the Feds, because of their theoretical ideals, but they'd rather deal with the Empire, because they don't pretend to be something they're not.
And those who think society should provide for those less fortunate should be pro-Empire. There are no homeless and hungry people clothed in rags in the Empire.Where you getting this from, where do the Alliance 'put it' in words exactly? I may need to rethink my loyalties if true.
The Empire doesnt have an 'image problem'. The Empire is the problem. Only those who assume they will be on the top of the pyramid or think they are better than other people want to be in the Empire. Anybody who thinks everyone should have a say is virtually automatically anti-Imp....then its a choice of 2 Democracies. Still find it strange the Marlinists went to Feds and not Alliance but thats a side issue, maybe they thought it offered better protection from the secret police.
The Empire has an image problem, but they make exceedingly good ships.
And those who think society should provide for those less fortunate should be pro-Empire. There are no homeless and hungry people clothed in rags in the Empire.
No youre right, instead they are chained and in the mines for years until their 'debt' is paid. Not sure that forcing people into debt just so you can own and sell them is 'providing' for them though.
No youre right, instead they are chained and in the mines for years until their 'debt' is paid. Not sure that forcing people into debt just so you can own and sell them is 'providing' for them though.
Those who treat their slaves badly should receive the same. After all, how can they work properly if they are not cared for correctly?
— Senator Zemina Torval