"Grounded in reality and science" means they should at least reduce the growth to a few spots on those planets..
I have yet to find these...
WOW that is a pretty sight, what planet is that? I've been looking for a kind of red/brownish sky but have only really found light purplesIt is better to think of life as a property of a planet, as far as we know. Biospheres are probably the unit, not organisms or a few small groves scattered on opposite sides of a planet. Obviously these life forms we are seeing are able to survive in what would be, for us, totally inhospitable conditions. Clearly there must be some source of free energy on these planets, and materials suitable to dissipate that free energy. The life forms that we see may be inappropriate for the conditions seen on these planets (we don't know!). But the argument that flora, if it exists, should be confined to a few tiny places just doesn't ring true.
Here's a screenshot:
![]()
They are still testing the radar invisibility gadgets?
Well, I'll have none then. Or maybe just wait for planets with denser atmosphere of which just a few have some life?Evolutionary biology tells us this is nonsense. Life restricted to a few spots on a planet is probably not going to survive very long due to local changes in climate, natural disasters like volcanoes, basically any localised phenomena could wipe out such life forms. For life to survive it needs to adapt to local conditions and spread out, if life exists it will be endemic, not localised.
Evolutionary biology tells us this is nonsense. Life restricted to a few spots on a planet is probably not going to survive very long due to local changes in climate, natural disasters like volcanoes, basically any localised phenomena could wipe out such life forms. For life to survive it needs to adapt to local conditions and spread out, if life exists it will be endemic, not localised.