Since you give me reasons to continue.
<snip snip snippity snip>
Calling you ignorant? Are you that sensitive? Here, have a tissue...
More baiting. You won't get very far with an argument like that.
1) That's stubborn.
More name-calling.
You are excluding yourself with bigger opportunities then just playing against the AI.
Only you seem to think we are cheating ourselves of the wonderful experience of playing in open.
You probably avoid a lot of people in your surroundings too.
Gratuitous swipe. Nothing to do with the topic or the game. More insult - if you don't think what you are posting is insulting to a member of the general public (not game public) then it is your reading comprehension I question.
1) Where did i begin with my argumentation that my intentions are fighting people and not sharing gameplay?
If you want to back up your claims against mine, you'll have to search your own posts to do so. Again, I don't do people's homework for them.
That again is stubborn and not constructive on a topic like this.
And your name-calling is a lot more deconstructive.
5)Reading comprehension please.
We comprehend more than you think.
6) Explain me what my kind of player is please. Is my kind more or less worthy, or even worth nothing, just because you might die in an incident that is clearly a gameplay mechanic?!
This was explained in several people's posts, quoting yourself. More homework.
7) Where did i suggest to penalize or minimize actions of Solo/Group?
This was explained in several people's posts, quoting yourself. More homework.
Again, word twisting or reading comprehension- you chose.
Again, this statement says more about you than about us.
8) I've suggested a ruleset that fits both. That caters your (Solo) demands and the demands of the healthy thinking multiplayer.
Some more of your "I know better than you." And it isn't the Solo/Group people who are making demands.
9) ...Just because i might wrote this under the quote of someone else doesn't say that i am talking about him.
This is such an absurd and hilarious statement, it takes the cake. And the cake is a lie.
10) What do you want to point out with taking my mom into this? Have i been personal in any post?
Pretty much, yeah.
11) Again, where did i suggest to take things away from Solo/Group.
Again, do your own homework. Maybe you're really unaware of how your posts come across.
Again, ignorance, obstinacy, twisting words, reading comprehension or intended spreading false facts. You chose.
I choose to highlight the problem areas in your posts. You seem to be stuck on the word "again" like it's somehow meaningful because you've typed it over and over.
12) I talked about winning certain scenarios. Like expanding into another system, or successful undermine another. I don't need to play the Elite games before this Elite to understand how this Elite works. The same fits with other titles. Maybe if i want to understand the Lore with of it's content, but not necessary for this particular game and it's mechanic. If it fits here on this point- where is war and where you are hostile, you will encounter resistance and fights, not just election based on who can grind the most.
And we have said, again and again, we aren't interested in your interpretation of what the game is supposed to be. The whole point of Elite returning is because it is a different game from most, and many of us like that difference, having played Elite titles for the last 30 years. You're still hung up on this "winning" thing.
I don't wiggle around my own words. You just simply put another meaning into what i said. Since you refuse to contribute to a constructive debate about this topic and keep on nailing that we have to accept how it is and that i should take care about your feelings, maybe you should leave this conversation? What constructive things have you brought up yet? Honestly i didn't see any.
Again, that "reading comprehension" thing rears it's head. I'll give you an example here because, again, I'm not doing your homework for you. But hey, I'll give you a free etymology lesson:
"I don't wiggle around my own words. You just simply put another meaning into what i said."
Not me. Seems like the majority seems to pretty much agree on what your position is. You are not the poor, beleaguered great-guy-of-the-universe which is implied in your statements.
"Since you refuse to contribute to a constructive debate about this topic"
LOL. No, really, L-O-O-L. You are implying that I've done nothing but attack you. It seems like no one here who doesn't agree with you 100% on the topic has anything to contribute. I wonder why you keep trying in such a "hostile" debate.
"and that i should take care about your feelings, maybe you should leave this conversation?"
First, I never said, nor, indeed, want you to care about my feelings. We've been discussing this issue for almost 3 years. YOU are "the new kid" joining the conversation. Think about that for awhile.
And really, don't ever try a back-handed threat like "maybe you should leave this conversation" again. Because I, and probably several others, have let you continue on a course that is by definition in flagrant violation of the forum rules, which you should read (page 1 and 3) This, disregarding all the rest of this post, paints you immediately as a threatening bully. Tell me how else to interpret this aggressive statement.
"What constructive things have you brought up yet? Honestly i didn't see any."
By your own admission, you haven't read this thread, nor the one that came before it on the same issue. So you really don't know what I have brought up or even my position. This debate has gone on for 16000+ posts & several years. You're bringing nothing new to the table but your attitude. You have demonstrated that you can't back it down. Not our fault.
"I am not forcing my ideas on anyone"
So... the whole world is against you? Everyone here is stupider than you? You are like a few others before you, trying through "fighting words," incomprehension of the general discussion and debating that everyone here is wrong but you. I don't even see the Open guys who debate here (and in a much more civil fashion) running to get your back. Think on that for awhile.
"But you simply keep on rejecting that there might be something for both parties."
Nope; we keep on rejecting your theory that everything should be in Open and that only then will everything "be great" with "awesome possibilities."
Please show me where i brought my seething contempt to expression.
I have just pointed it out in multiple quotes of yours in this post. Any more, you'll have to do your own homework. But here's a clue: it was in your first handful of posts.
No one of the pro Solo, or let's say contra Open faction ever listened.
That's because the first posts you made indicated that you had a closed mind and a nasty case of the fuming mouth. If you'd read the whole thread (16000+ posts) before getting nasty with words, you would have found that most people wouldn't take you seriously because of exactly that. You would also have found some reasoned debate on this issue, people from Open and Solo/Groups hashing out ideas and some give and take from both sides.
And again
OK, this gimmick is getting old. No one is impressed by your ability to repeat the same phrase over and over.
you are spreading a misrepresentation of my behavior.
Naw, I've been using your own posts to show you how you at least muddle your own "points" and then claim to be misrepresented. I really am not sure at this point if you actually read any posts and think about them, or you're like that guy at a party who only waits in conversation until he can drag it back to himself.
I never brought up anger or insisted on something.
You did. Several times. Again, do your own homework.
I expressed how i and many others experience the situation in the Open play and brought up the fact that with just one mode available this experience would be different.
You don't really have a sense of your posts, do you? You really should read what you wrote and think about it before posting.