Seems that they are actually testing that kind of stuff:
Source: http://gearpatrol.com/2016/10/06/interview-chris-roberts-star-citizen-creator/
Whatever happened to their space trading board-game?
Seems that they are actually testing that kind of stuff:
Source: http://gearpatrol.com/2016/10/06/interview-chris-roberts-star-citizen-creator/
Whatever happened to their space trading board-game?
Seems that they are actually testing that kind of stuff:
Source: http://gearpatrol.com/2016/10/06/interview-chris-roberts-star-citizen-creator/
That's going to get pretty messy don't you think?If you take a look at the ship details, you will see that most of the "minimum crew" of 13 players are either gunners for the 5 manned turrets, or crew members for the 7 consoles, which will most likely handle the ship shields, power distribution etc... I guess the remaining one will be the pilot, who i guess will control the automated turret the same way a Hornet pilot does.
So my guess is that yes, a single player will be able to pilot a Polaris, but with several reductions in capability because he will just control a single turret.
Whatever happened to their space trading board-game?
No, that is what he wants. There is no indication that actually exists, especially since he goes onto talking about concept the very next paragraph. Again, until it is plugged in and actually demonstrable then it exists as much as the Pupil to Planet did as a real-time in-game technology.
can invalidate this:The whole concept is to have a living, breathing universe that reacts and responds to the players’ actions.
We actually have a full universe simulation that runs on separate servers, responsible for deciding which planets are trading, which organization is doing what, which factories are doing well, who’s selling what, who needs what kind of goods.
Whatever happened to their space trading board-game?
That's going to get pretty messy don't you think?
Or do you imagine everyone going full-military on it complete with punishments for people deserting their posts or not ensuring their internet connection is up to scratch to keep up with the rest of you?
No, that is what he wants. There is no indication that actually exists, especially since he goes onto talking about concept the very next paragraph. Again, until it is plugged in and actually demonstrable then it exists as much as the Pupil to Planet did as a real-time in-game technology.
We obviously haven’t got all this working; it’s all in different stages of development, but that’s the long-term vision — a dynamic, living, breathing universe where you can just go off and spend as long as you want in it.
UNIVERSE! 100 Systems. Small universe.
Sorry Chris, but FD got it three years ago. Like seriously. Still selling other people ideas and dreams as yours it seems. Disgusting.
We would be in civil court. Burden of proof is "more likely than not...".No sane person would demand undeniable proof before becoming suspicious. We're not in a court of law, we're just a bunch of people noticing very fishy stuff happening. Noone is proving a claim, we're just pointing out that SC is starting to smell funny. You may argue you like the smell, but its still weird to some others. Including me.
In that case, there is no need to fear of him not delivering the game. Since it's something which has already been done several times, it should be piece of cake even for any mismanaged team of noob developers, right?
Well, the human explored universe is 1 star system in real life, and just 1 planet human populated. Yet humanity has been capable of having thousands of years of fun just with that small amount of playable area...
There is apparently a discount for cash if you are in one of the handily identifiable open wallet classes such as concierge or subscriber or you attend cit Con!
In that case, there is no need to fear of him not delivering the game. Since it's something which has already been done several times, it should be piece of cake even for any mismanaged team of noob developers, right?
In other news: According to the funding spreadsheet, CIG has earned 1,244,634 dollars until now (counted from GMT-6, IIRC), and the day isn't over yet. I wonder if the Concierge/subscriber-only discount is going to be active throughout CitCon, if not, we could very rougly calculate a number of "privileged" people who could have bought Polaris at a discounted price. If I remember correctly, the discounted, real-money only price is 625 dollars, which gives us at most 1991 buyers.
Is there anything stopping CIG from buying some of these ships themselves, to make it appear they are selling well?
Just asking, as they don't seem to publish any accounts.
I don't think they make up incoming numbers. They are very sush about their expenses though.Is there anything stopping CIG from buying some of these ships themselves, to make it appear they are selling well?
Just asking, as they don't seem to publish any accounts.