The Star Citizen Thread v5

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
All of course which is made quite clear before one purchases said ship. So in other words, its just people that want to complain about Star Citizen.

You mean the small print in the bottom left of one section saying Note: Ship specifications are subject to change.

Quite clear?

And stop spamming the thread with your expensive jpegs.
 
Last edited:
Guys its not about the mapping, keys are perfectly fine - the way ships handles and how they react to the input is a holy rage. I`m talking about infamous flight model. Altho, after last update it got slight less frustrating.
 

dsmart

Banned
On the JPEG thing. How can the fact that people are willing to part with (in some cases) tens of thousands of dollars, for pictures of spaceships that may, or may not be, put into a game that may, or may not be released, not appear both baffling and hilarious at the same time.

Money laundering.
 
I think guys from Mass Effect Andromeda did those immersive facial animations :D

Maybe this 2 could be perfect future couple.......

couple_zpsukimlsnf.jpg


by the way her face is tired and he looks to much optimistic for pre alpha state.....
 
How could I forget about the flying gas station.

It's not a gas station. It has neither gas (neither the liquid which is called 'gas' for some reason nor more general "fuel"), nor is it stationary. Makes you wonder how much time will it take CIG to make other ships larger than 50 meters, all they did in 2016 was Starfarer and Caterpillar.
 
No, I don't. It's appropriately right there on the Technical Overview. It's not even the smallest font in the panel.

Not everyone needs a <blink> tag...

Look, I'm not really bothered what CIG do with their pictures of spaceships. If they add or take away a few pixels here or there, I couldn't care less. But I do find it quite funny. [smile]
 
Last edited:
Funny, that when you buy a ship or package, that the same warning comes up a total of THREE times.

One on the web page itself.

One when you have the ship/package in your cart.

The final one just before finalize your payment.

I didn't know the grey-market came with disclaimers other than "NO REFUNDS SUCKER".
 
Funny, that when you buy a ship or package, that the same warning comes up a total of THREE times.

One on the web page itself.

One when you have the ship/package in your cart.

The final one just before finalize your payment.

Do you think I am the kind of person who would get that far into purchasing one? Nah. [smile]
 
I personally dislike how half of the fighters in the game should have approximately 100 m/s delta-v. I really don't know where are they putting fuel in these things, and that's a game that prides itself on the ships being made from discrete components that can be destroyed. There's also Avenger, which perhaps have fuel somewhere, but there's absolutely no room for the engine, unless it's 40 centimeters high.
 
Awwww, pedantic is being pedantic.

CIG has a few ships larger than 50 meters in engine and in game already.

IDRIS
Javelin
Several of the Vanduul ships
Constellation classes (flyable)
Retailiator (flyable)
Starfarer (flyable)
Caterpillar (flyable)

There's no Javelin or large Vanduul ships in-game. Constellation variants and Retaliator were done before 2016, and I was summarizing the progress last year. But if you want to, I can include them. So instead of CIG doing two large ships per year, they have done 4 of them since 2013, which gives one large ship per year. Even less encouraging than my estimate.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom